Home  ›  What Is the Fastest We Could Travel in Space

What Is the Fastest We Could Travel in Space

Written By Wednesday, May 11, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Hypothetical travel between stars or planetary systems

A Bussard ramjet, one of many possible methods that could serve to propel spacecraft.

Interstellar travel refers to the idea of interstellar probes or crewed spacecraft moving between stars or planetary systems in a galaxy. Interstellar travel would exist much more difficult than interplanetary spaceflight. Whereas the distances betwixt the planets in the Solar System are less than 30 astronomical units (AU), the distances between stars are typically hundreds of thousands of AU, and usually expressed in lite-years. Considering of the vastness of those distances, non-generational interstellar travel based on known physics would need to occur at a loftier percent of the speed of light; notwithstanding, travel times would be long, at least decades and perhaps millennia or longer.[1]

As of 2022, five uncrewed spacecraft, all launched and operated by the United States, have achieved the escape velocity required to leave the Solar System, as role of missions to explore parts of the outer organization. They will therefore continue to travel through interstellar space indefinitely. However, they volition not approach some other star for hundreds of thousands of years, long later they accept ceased to operate (though in theory the Voyager Golden Record would be playable in the highly unlikely event that the spacecraft is retrieved by an extraterrestrial civilization).

The speeds required for interstellar travel in a human lifetime far exceed what current methods of infinite travel can provide. Even with a hypothetically perfectly efficient propulsion organisation, the kinetic free energy corresponding to those speeds is enormous past today'south standards of free energy development. Moreover, collisions at those speeds, of the spacecraft with cosmic grit and gas, can be very unsafe for both passengers and the spacecraft itself.[1]

A number of strategies have been proposed to deal with these problems, ranging from behemothic arks that would carry unabridged societies and ecosystems, to microscopic space probes. Many different spacecraft propulsion systems have been proposed to give spacecraft the required speeds, including nuclear propulsion, beam-powered propulsion, and methods based on speculative physics.[two]

For both crewed and uncrewed interstellar travel, considerable technological and economic challenges demand to exist met. Even the almost optimistic views almost interstellar travel come across it as just being feasible in decades. Withal, in spite of the challenges, if or when interstellar travel is realized, a broad range of scientific benefits are expected.[3]

Virtually interstellar travel concepts crave a developed infinite logistics system capable of moving millions of tonnes to a construction / operating location, and most would crave gigawatt-scale power for construction or power (such as Star Wisp or Calorie-free Sail type concepts). Such a organization could abound organically if space-based solar power became a pregnant component of Earth's energy mix. Consumer demand for a multi-terawatt system would create the necessary multi-one thousand thousand ton/year logistical system.[4]

Challenges [edit]

Interstellar distances [edit]

Distances betwixt the planets in the Solar System are frequently measured in astronomical units (AU), divers every bit the boilerplate distance between the Lord's day and Earth, some i.5×108 kilometers (93 1000000 miles). Venus, the closest planet to Earth is (at closest approach) 0.28 AU away. Neptune, the farthest planet from the Sun, is 29.8 AU abroad. As of January 19, 2022, Voyager spaceprobe, the uttermost human-fabricated object from Earth, is 156 AU away.[v]

The closest known star, Proxima Centauri, is approximately 268,332 AU away, or over 9,000 times farther away than Neptune.

Object Distance
(AU) 		Light time
Moon 0.0026 1.3 seconds
Dominicus 1 8 minutes
Venus (nearest planet) 0.28 2.41 minutes
Neptune (farthest planet) 29.8 4.1 hours
Voyager ane 148.7 20.41 hours
Proxima Centauri (nearest star and exoplanet) 268,332 4.24 years

Because of this, distances betwixt stars are unremarkably expressed in light-years (divers equally the distance that low-cal travels in vacuum in one Julian year) or in parsecs (one parsec is 3.26 ly, the distance at which stellar parallax is exactly one arcsecond, hence the proper name). Light in a vacuum travels around 300,000 kilometres (186,000 mi) per 2d, so one low-cal-twelvemonth is most 9.461×1012 kilometers (5.879 trillion miles) or 63,241 AU. Proxima Centauri, the nearest (admitting not naked-heart visible) star, is 4.243 lite-years abroad.

Some other way of understanding the vastness of interstellar distances is by scaling: 1 of the closest stars to the Sun, Alpha Centauri A (a Sun-similar star), can exist pictured past scaling downwards the Globe–Sun distance to one meter (3.28 ft). On this scale, the distance to Alpha Centauri A would be 276 kilometers (171 miles).

The fastest outward-bound spacecraft yet sent, Voyager one, has covered one/600 of a low-cal-year in 30 years and is currently moving at one/18,000 the speed of light. At this rate, a journey to Proxima Centauri would take 80,000 years.[six]

Required energy [edit]

A pregnant factor contributing to the difficulty is the energy that must be supplied to obtain a reasonable travel fourth dimension. A lower bound for the required energy is the kinetic energy K = one 2 m v ii {\displaystyle K={\tfrac {1}{2}}mv^{2}} where m {\displaystyle one thousand} is the final mass. If deceleration on inflow is desired and cannot exist accomplished by any means other than the engines of the ship, then the lower spring for the required energy is doubled to yard 5 2 {\displaystyle mv^{2}} .[seven]

The velocity for a crewed round trip of a few decades to fifty-fifty the nearest star is several thousand times greater than those of present space vehicles. This means that due to the v two {\displaystyle v^{2}} term in the kinetic energy formula, millions of times every bit much energy is required. Accelerating one ton to ane-tenth of the speed of lite requires at least 450 petajoules or 4.fifty×1017 joules or 125 terawatt-hours[8] (earth energy consumption 2008 was 143,851 terawatt-hours),[ix] without factoring in efficiency of the propulsion mechanism. This free energy has to be generated onboard from stored fuel, harvested from the interstellar medium, or projected over immense distances.

Interstellar medium [edit]

A knowledge of the properties of the interstellar gas and dust through which the vehicle must pass is essential for the design of any interstellar infinite mission.[x] A major issue with traveling at extremely high speeds is that interstellar dust may cause considerable harm to the arts and crafts, due to the loftier relative speeds and large kinetic energies involved. Diverse shielding methods to mitigate this trouble have been proposed.[11] Larger objects (such as macroscopic grit grains) are far less common, merely would be much more than destructive. The risks of impacting such objects, and methods of mitigating these risks, have been discussed in literature, but many unknowns remain[12] and, attributable to the inhomogeneous distribution of interstellar matter around the Sun, volition depend on management travelled.[10] Although a high density interstellar medium may crusade difficulties for many interstellar travel concepts, interstellar ramjets, and some proposed concepts for decelerating interstellar spacecraft, would actually do good from a denser interstellar medium.[10]

Hazards [edit]

The coiffure of an interstellar transport would face several meaning hazards, including the psychological effects of long-term isolation, the furnishings of exposure to ionizing radiation, and the physiological effects of weightlessness to the muscles, joints, basic, immune system, and eyes. In that location also exists the chance of impact by micrometeoroids and other space debris. These risks represent challenges that have yet to exist overcome.[thirteen]

Expect calculation [edit]

The physicist Robert Fifty. Forrad has argued that an interstellar mission that cannot be completed inside 50 years should not exist started at all. Instead, assuming that a civilization is still on an increasing bend of propulsion system velocity and not yet having reached the limit, the resources should be invested in designing a meliorate propulsion system. This is considering a slow spacecraft would probably exist passed by another mission sent later with more advanced propulsion (the incessant obsolescence postulate).[14]

On the other hand, Andrew Kennedy has shown that if one calculates the journeying time to a given destination as the rate of travel speed derived from growth (even exponential growth) increases, there is a clear minimum in the total fourth dimension to that destination from now.[xv] Voyages undertaken before the minimum will be overtaken by those that leave at the minimum, whereas voyages that leave after the minimum will never overtake those that left at the minimum.

Prime targets for interstellar travel [edit]

There are 59 known stellar systems inside forty light years of the Sun, containing 81 visible stars. The following could exist considered prime targets for interstellar missions:[14]

Organisation Distance (ly) Remarks
Blastoff Centauri four.3 Closest organization. Three stars (G2, K1, M5). Component A is similar to the Lord's day (a G2 star). On Baronial 24, 2016, the discovery of an Earth-size exoplanet (Proxima Centauri b) orbiting in the habitable zone of Proxima Centauri was announced.
Barnard'due south Star 6 Modest, depression-luminosity M5 crimson dwarf. 2d closest to Solar System.
Sirius 8.7 Big, very bright A1 star with a white dwarf companion.
Epsilon Eridani 10.8 Single K2 star slightly smaller and colder than the Lord's day. It has ii asteroid belts, might take a giant and one much smaller planet,[sixteen] and may possess a Solar-System-type planetary system.
Tau Ceti xi.8 Unmarried G8 star similar to the Sun. High probability of possessing a Solar-System-type planetary system: current bear witness shows 5 planets with potentially two in the habitable zone.
Luyten's Star 12.36 M3 red dwarf with the super-Earth Luyten b orbiting in the habitable zone.
Wolf 1061 ~14 Wolf 1061 c is 4.three times the size of World; it may have rocky terrain. It too sits inside the 'Goldilocks' zone where it might be possible for liquid water to exist.[17]
Gliese 581 planetary organization xx.3 Multiple planet system. The unconfirmed exoplanet Gliese 581g and the confirmed exoplanet Gliese 581d are in the star's habitable zone.
Gliese 667C 22 A system with at least 6 planets. A record-breaking three of these planets are super-Earths lying in the zone around the star where liquid h2o could exist, making them possible candidates for the presence of life.[18]
Vega 25 A very young system possibly in the process of planetary formation.[19]
TRAPPIST-1 39 A recently discovered system which boasts 7 Earth-like planets, some of which may have liquid h2o. The discovery is a major advocacy in finding a habitable planet and in finding a planet that could back up life.

Existing and near-term astronomical engineering science is capable of finding planetary systems around these objects, increasing their potential for exploration.

Proposed methods [edit]

Slow, uncrewed probes [edit]

Deadening interstellar missions based on current and near-hereafter propulsion technologies are associated with trip times starting from most one hundred years to thousands of years. These missions consist of sending a robotic probe to a nearby star for exploration, similar to interplanetary probes similar those used in the Voyager program.[twenty] By taking along no crew, the cost and complexity of the mission is significantly reduced although technology lifetime is nonetheless a pregnant issue next to obtaining a reasonable speed of travel. Proposed concepts include Project Daedalus, Projection Icarus, Project Dragonfly, Project Longshot,[21] and more recently Quantum Starshot.[22]

Fast, uncrewed probes [edit]

Nanoprobes [edit]

About-lightspeed nano spacecraft might be possible within the nigh future built on existing microchip engineering science with a newly developed nanoscale thruster. Researchers at the Academy of Michigan are developing thrusters that apply nanoparticles equally propellant. Their technology is called "nanoparticle field extraction thruster", or nanoFET. These devices deed like small particle accelerators shooting conductive nanoparticles out into space.[23]

Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist, has suggested that clouds of "smart dust" be sent to the stars, which may go possible with advances in nanotechnology. Kaku also notes that a large number of nanoprobes would demand to exist sent due to the vulnerability of very pocket-sized probes to be easily deflected by magnetic fields, micrometeorites and other dangers to ensure the chances that at to the lowest degree one nanoprobe will survive the journey and achieve the destination.[24]

As a virtually-term solution, small, laser-propelled interstellar probes, based on current CubeSat engineering were proposed in the context of Projection Dragonfly.[21]

Tiresome, crewed missions [edit]

In crewed missions, the elapsing of a deadening interstellar journey presents a major obstacle and existing concepts deal with this problem in different ways.[25] They can be distinguished by the "state" in which humans are transported on-board of the spacecraft.

Generation ships [edit]

A generation ship (or earth ship) is a blazon of interstellar ark in which the crew that arrives at the destination is descended from those who started the journey. Generation ships are non currently viable because of the difficulty of constructing a ship of the enormous required scale and the smashing biological and sociological bug that life aboard such a ship raises.[26] [27] [28] [29] [30]

Suspended animation [edit]

Scientists and writers have postulated various techniques for suspended animation. These include human hibernation and cryonic preservation. Although neither is currently practical, they offer the possibility of sleeper ships in which the passengers prevarication inert for the long elapsing of the voyage.[31]

Frozen embryos [edit]

A robotic interstellar mission carrying some number of frozen early on stage human embryos is another theoretical possibility. This method of space colonization requires, amongst other things, the development of an bogus uterus, the prior detection of a habitable terrestrial planet, and advances in the field of fully autonomous mobile robots and educational robots that would replace human being parents.[32]

Isle hopping through interstellar infinite [edit]

Interstellar space is not completely empty; it contains trillions of icy bodies ranging from modest asteroids (Oort cloud) to possible rogue planets. There may be ways to take advantage of these resource for a good part of an interstellar trip, slowly hopping from torso to body or setting upwards waystations along the manner.[33]

Fast, crewed missions [edit]

If a spaceship could boilerplate 10 percent of light speed (and decelerate at the destination, for human being crewed missions), this would be enough to reach Proxima Centauri in forty years. Several propulsion concepts accept been proposed[34] that might be eventually developed to attain this (meet § Propulsion below), but none of them are set for virtually-term (few decades) developments at acceptable cost.

Fourth dimension dilation [edit]

Physicists generally believe faster-than-calorie-free travel is impossible. Relativistic fourth dimension dilation allows a traveler to experience time more than slowly, the closer their speed is to the speed of light.[35] This apparent slowing becomes noticeable when velocities to a higher place 80% of the speed of light are attained. Clocks aboard an interstellar ship would run slower than Globe clocks, then if a send's engines were capable of continuously generating around 1 g of acceleration (which is comfortable for humans), the ship could achieve almost anywhere in the galaxy and return to Globe within 40 years ship-time (see diagram). Upon return, there would be a divergence between the time elapsed on the astronaut's ship and the time elapsed on World.

For case, a spaceship could travel to a star 32 light-years away, initially accelerating at a abiding 1.03g (i.e. 10.ane yard/s2) for 1.32 years (transport time), then stopping its engines and coasting for the side by side 17.3 years (ship time) at a abiding speed, so decelerating over again for one.32 ship-years, and coming to a terminate at the destination. Later a brusk visit, the astronaut could return to Earth the same style. After the full round-trip, the clocks on board the transport evidence that 40 years have passed, but according to those on Earth, the ship comes back 76 years after launch.

From the viewpoint of the astronaut, onboard clocks seem to exist running normally. The star ahead seems to be approaching at a speed of 0.87 lite years per ship-year. The universe would appear contracted forth the direction of travel to one-half the size it had when the transport was at rest; the distance between that star and the Dominicus would seem to be xvi light years as measured by the astronaut.

At higher speeds, the fourth dimension on board volition run even slower, and then the astronaut could travel to the center of the Galaxy (30,000 light years from Earth) and back in xl years ship-fourth dimension. But the speed according to Earth clocks will always be less than 1 calorie-free twelvemonth per Globe year, then, when dorsum home, the astronaut volition find that more than 60 one thousand years will have passed on Earth.

Abiding acceleration [edit]

This plot shows a send capable of 1-thousand (10 yard/due south2 or about 1.0 ly/ytwo) "felt" or proper-acceleration[36] can make it, except for the problem of accelerating on-board propellant.

Regardless of how it is achieved, a propulsion system that could produce dispatch continuously from divergence to arrival would exist the fastest method of travel. A abiding acceleration journey is ane where the propulsion system accelerates the ship at a constant rate for the kickoff half of the journeying, and and then decelerates for the second one-half, so that it arrives at the destination stationary relative to where it began. If this were performed with an acceleration similar to that experienced at the Globe's surface, it would have the added advantage of producing bogus "gravity" for the crew. Supplying the free energy required, withal, would exist prohibitively expensive with current technology.[37]

From the perspective of a planetary observer, the ship will appear to accelerate steadily at first, just then more gradually equally it approaches the speed of light (which it cannot exceed). It will undergo hyperbolic motion.[38] The transport will be close to the speed of light after nigh a year of accelerating and remain at that speed until it brakes for the cease of the journey.

From the perspective of an onboard observer, the coiffure volition feel a gravitational field contrary the engine'due south acceleration, and the universe ahead will appear to autumn in that field, undergoing hyperbolic move. As part of this, distances between objects in the direction of the transport's movement volition gradually contract until the ship begins to decelerate, at which time an onboard observer's experience of the gravitational field will exist reversed.

When the ship reaches its destination, if it were to substitution a message with its origin planet, it would find that less time had elapsed on board than had elapsed for the planetary observer, due to fourth dimension dilation and length contraction.

The event is an impressively fast journey for the crew.

Propulsion [edit]

Rocket concepts [edit]

All rocket concepts are limited by the rocket equation, which sets the characteristic velocity bachelor as a function of exhaust velocity and mass ratio, the ratio of initial (M 0, including fuel) to final (M i, fuel depleted) mass.

Very high specific power, the ratio of thrust to total vehicle mass, is required to reach interstellar targets within sub-century time-frames.[39] Some estrus transfer is inevitable and a tremendous heating load must be fairly handled.

Thus, for interstellar rocket concepts of all technologies, a key engineering problem (seldom explicitly discussed) is limiting the heat transfer from the exhaust stream back into the vehicle.[twoscore]

Ion engine [edit]

A blazon of electrical propulsion, spacecraft such as Dawn use an ion engine. In an ion engine, electrical power is used to create charged particles of the propellant, usually the gas xenon, and advance them to extremely high velocities. The exhaust velocity of conventional rockets is limited to about v km/s by the chemical energy stored in the fuel's molecular bonds. They produce a high thrust (about ten6 N), but they have a low specific impulse, and that limits their top speed. Past contrast, ion engines have low forcefulness, only the top speed in principle is limited only by the electric power available on the spacecraft and on the gas ions being accelerated. The exhaust speed of the charged particles range from 15 km/due south to 35 km/s.[41]

Nuclear fission powered [edit]

Fission-electrical [edit]

Nuclear-electric or plasma engines, operating for long periods at low thrust and powered by fission reactors, have the potential to reach speeds much greater than chemically powered vehicles or nuclear-thermal rockets. Such vehicles probably accept the potential to power solar arrangement exploration with reasonable trip times within the current century. Because of their low-thrust propulsion, they would be limited to off-planet, deep-infinite operation. Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion powered by a portable power-source, say a nuclear reactor, producing but small accelerations, would take centuries to reach for example 15% of the velocity of lite, thus unsuitable for interstellar flying during a single human lifetime.[42]

Fission-fragment [edit]

Fission-fragment rockets employ nuclear fission to create loftier-speed jets of fission fragments, which are ejected at speeds of up to 12,000 km/south (seven,500 mi/southward). With fission, the energy output is approximately 0.1% of the total mass-free energy of the reactor fuel and limits the effective frazzle velocity to near 5% of the velocity of light. For maximum velocity, the reaction mass should optimally consist of fission products, the "ash" of the chief energy source, so no extra reaction mass demand be bookkept in the mass ratio.

Nuclear pulse [edit]

Modernistic Pulsed Fission Propulsion Concept.

Based on work in the late 1950s to the early 1960s, it has been technically possible to build spaceships with nuclear pulse propulsion engines, i.e. driven past a series of nuclear explosions. This propulsion arrangement contains the prospect of very high specific impulse (infinite travel's equivalent of fuel economic system) and loftier specific ability.[43]

Projection Orion squad member Freeman Dyson proposed in 1968 an interstellar spacecraft using nuclear pulse propulsion that used pure deuterium fusion detonations with a very loftier fuel-burnup fraction. He computed an exhaust velocity of 15,000 km/s and a 100,000-tonne space vehicle able to attain a 20,000 km/due south delta-v allowing a flight-time to Blastoff Centauri of 130 years.[44] Later studies indicate that the elevation cruise velocity that tin theoretically be achieved by a Teller-Ulam thermonuclear unit of measurement powered Orion starship, assuming no fuel is saved for slowing back downward, is about 8% to 10% of the speed of light (0.08-0.1c).[45] An atomic (fission) Orion tin can achieve perhaps 3%-v% of the speed of light. A nuclear pulse drive starship powered by fusion-antimatter catalyzed nuclear pulse propulsion units would be similarly in the 10% range and pure matter-antimatter annihilation rockets would exist theoretically capable of obtaining a velocity betwixt l% to eighty% of the speed of light. In each example saving fuel for slowing down halves the maximum speed. The concept of using a magnetic sail to decelerate the spacecraft every bit it approaches its destination has been discussed as an alternative to using propellant, this would allow the send to travel most the maximum theoretical velocity.[46] Culling designs utilizing similar principles include Project Longshot, Projection Daedalus, and Mini-Magazine Orion. The principle of external nuclear pulse propulsion to maximize survivable power has remained common amid serious concepts for interstellar flight without external power beaming and for very high-performance interplanetary flight.

In the 1970s the Nuclear Pulse Propulsion concept further was refined by Project Daedalus by use of externally triggered inertial confinement fusion, in this case producing fusion explosions via compressing fusion fuel pellets with high-powered electron beams. Since then, lasers, ion beams, neutral particle beams and hyper-kinetic projectiles have been suggested to produce nuclear pulses for propulsion purposes.[47]

A current impediment to the evolution of any nuclear-explosion-powered spacecraft is the 1963 Fractional Test Ban Treaty, which includes a prohibition on the detonation of any nuclear devices (even non-weapon based) in outer space. This treaty would, therefore, need to be renegotiated, although a project on the scale of an interstellar mission using currently foreseeable applied science would probably crave international cooperation on at least the scale of the International Space Station.

Another issue to exist considered, would exist the k-forces imparted to a chop-chop accelerated spacecraft, cargo, and passengers within (come across Inertia negation).

Nuclear fusion rockets [edit]

Fusion rocket starships, powered by nuclear fusion reactions, should conceivably be able to reach speeds of the order of 10% of that of light, based on energy considerations alone. In theory, a large number of stages could push button a vehicle arbitrarily close to the speed of calorie-free.[48] These would "fire" such light chemical element fuels as deuterium, tritium, 3He, elevenB, and sevenLi. Because fusion yields about 0.three–0.9% of the mass of the nuclear fuel every bit released energy, it is energetically more favorable than fission, which releases <0.ane% of the fuel's mass-free energy. The maximum frazzle velocities potentially energetically bachelor are correspondingly higher than for fission, typically 4–10% of the speed of calorie-free. However, the most easily doable fusion reactions release a big fraction of their energy as high-free energy neutrons, which are a significant source of energy loss. Thus, although these concepts seem to offer the best (nearest-term) prospects for travel to the nearest stars within a (long) human being lifetime, they still involve massive technological and engineering difficulties, which may plough out to be intractable for decades or centuries.

Daedalus interstellar probe.

Early studies include Project Daedalus, performed past the British Interplanetary Guild in 1973–1978, and Project Longshot, a student project sponsored by NASA and the U.s. Naval Academy, completed in 1988. Another fairly detailed vehicle system, "Discovery II",[49] designed and optimized for crewed Solar System exploration, based on the D3He reaction just using hydrogen equally reaction mass, has been described by a team from NASA's Glenn Inquiry Center. Information technology achieves characteristic velocities of >300 km/south with an acceleration of ~1.7•10−three g, with a ship initial mass of ~1700 metric tons, and payload fraction in a higher place 10%. Although these are all the same far brusque of the requirements for interstellar travel on human timescales, the study seems to represent a reasonable benchmark towards what may be approachable within several decades, which is not impossibly beyond the current land-of-the-art. Based on the concept'south ii.2% burnup fraction it could reach a pure fusion product exhaust velocity of ~3,000 km/s.

Antimatter rockets [edit]

An antimatter rocket would take a far higher energy density and specific impulse than whatever other proposed class of rocket.[34] If energy resources and efficient product methods are found to make antimatter in the quantities required and store[50] [51] it safely, it would exist theoretically possible to attain speeds of several tens of pct that of lite.[34] Whether antimatter propulsion could pb to the higher speeds (>90% that of light) at which relativistic time dilation would become more than noticeable, thus making time pass at a slower charge per unit for the travelers as perceived by an outside observer, is doubtful owing to the large quantity of antimatter that would be required.[34] [52]

Speculating that product and storage of antimatter should go feasible, two further issues need to be considered. First, in the annihilation of antimatter, much of the energy is lost as high-energy gamma radiation, and specially besides equally neutrinos, and then that simply nigh forty% of mc 2 would actually be bachelor if the antimatter were only immune to demolish into radiation thermally.[34] Withal, the energy available for propulsion would be substantially higher than the ~1% of mc 2 yield of nuclear fusion, the adjacent-best rival candidate.

2d, heat transfer from the exhaust to the vehicle seems likely to transfer enormous wasted energy into the ship (due east.g. for 0.1g ship dispatch, budgeted 0.3 trillion watts per ton of send mass), considering the large fraction of the energy that goes into penetrating gamma rays. Fifty-fifty assuming shielding was provided to protect the payload (and passengers on a crewed vehicle), some of the energy would inevitably heat the vehicle, and may thereby prove a limiting factor if useful accelerations are to be achieved.

More recently, Friedwardt Winterberg proposed that a matter-antimatter GeV gamma ray light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation photon rocket is possible by a relativistic proton-antiproton compression belch, where the recoil from the laser beam is transmitted by the Mössbauer upshot to the spacecraft.[53]

Rockets with an external energy source [edit]

Rockets deriving their ability from external sources, such as a laser, could replace their internal energy source with an energy collector, potentially reducing the mass of the ship profoundly and allowing much higher travel speeds. Geoffrey A. Landis has proposed an interstellar probe, with free energy supplied by an external laser from a base station powering an Ion thruster.[54]

Non-rocket concepts [edit]

A trouble with all traditional rocket propulsion methods is that the spacecraft would need to carry its fuel with it, thus making it very massive, in accordance with the rocket equation. Several concepts attempt to escape from this problem:[34] [55]

RF resonant cavity thruster [edit]

A radio frequency (RF) resonant cavity thruster is a device that is claimed to be a spacecraft thruster. In 2016, the Advanced Propulsion Physics Laboratory at NASA reported observing a small apparent thrust from one such examination, a result non since replicated.[56] I of the designs is called EMDrive. In December 2002, Satellite Propulsion Enquiry Ltd described a working image with an alleged total thrust of almost 0.02 newtons powered past an 850 West crenel magnetron. The device could operate for only a few dozen seconds before the magnetron failed, due to overheating.[57] The latest test on the EMDrive ended that information technology does non work.[58]

Helical engine [edit]

Proposed in 2019 past NASA scientist Dr. David Burns, the helical engine concept would use a particle accelerator to advance particles to almost the speed of low-cal. Since particles traveling at such speeds acquire more mass, information technology is believed that this mass change could create acceleration. According to Burns, the spacecraft could theoretically accomplish 99% the speed of calorie-free.[59]

Interstellar ramjets [edit]

In 1960, Robert W. Bussard proposed the Bussard ramjet, a fusion rocket in which a huge scoop would collect the diffuse hydrogen in interstellar space, "fire" it on the fly using a proton–proton concatenation reaction, and miscarry it out of the back. After calculations with more authentic estimates advise that the thrust generated would be less than the elevate caused past any conceivable scoop design.[ citation needed ] All the same the idea is attractive because the fuel would exist collected en route (commensurate with the concept of energy harvesting), so the arts and crafts could theoretically advance to near the speed of lite. The limitation is due to the fact that the reaction tin can only accelerate the propellant to 0.12c. Thus the elevate of communicable interstellar grit and the thrust of accelerating that same dust to 0.12c would be the aforementioned when the speed is 0.12c, preventing further acceleration.

Beamed propulsion [edit]

A low-cal sail or magnetic sail powered past a massive laser or particle accelerator in the abode star organization could potentially accomplish even greater speeds than rocket- or pulse propulsion methods, because it would not need to deport its own reaction mass and therefore would only need to accelerate the arts and crafts'southward payload. Robert L. Forward proposed a ways for decelerating an interstellar craft with a light canvas of 100 kilometers in the destination star system without requiring a laser array to be present in that system. In this scheme, a secondary canvas of xxx kilometers is deployed to the rear of the spacecraft, while the large primary sail is detached from the arts and crafts to keep moving forward on its own. Light is reflected from the big primary sail to the secondary sheet, which is used to decelerate the secondary canvass and the spacecraft payload.[lx] In 2002, Geoffrey A. Landis of NASA'southward Glen Research middle also proposed a laser-powered, propulsion, sail ship that would host a diamond sheet (of a few nanometers thick) powered with the utilise of solar free energy.[61] With this proposal, this interstellar ship would, theoretically, be able to attain 10 percentage the speed of light. It has also been proposed to apply beamed-powered propulsion to advance a spacecraft, and electromagnetic propulsion to decelerate it; thus, eliminating the trouble that the Bussard ramjet has with the drag produced during acceleration.[62]

A magnetic sail could also decelerate at its destination without depending on carried fuel or a driving beam in the destination system, past interacting with the plasma found in the solar current of air of the destination star and the interstellar medium.[63] [64]

The following table lists some example concepts using beamed light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation propulsion equally proposed by the physicist Robert L. Frontwards:[65]

Mission Laser Power Vehicle Mass Dispatch Sail Diameter Maximum Velocity
(% of the speed of lite)
1. Flyby – Alpha Centauri, 40 years
outbound stage 65 GW one t 0.036 g 3.half dozen km 11% @ 0.17 ly
2. Rendezvous – Blastoff Centauri, 41 years
outbound stage 7,200 GW 785 t 0.005 g 100 km 21% @ 4.29 ly[ dubious – hash out ]
deceleration stage 26,000 GW 71 t 0.2 1000 xxx km 21% @ 4.29 ly
3. Crewed – Epsilon Eridani, 51 years (including 5 years exploring star system)
outbound stage 75,000,000 GW 78,500 t 0.3 yard thou km 50% @ 0.4 ly
deceleration stage 21,500,000 GW 7,850 t 0.3 g 320 km 50% @ 10.iv ly
render stage 710,000 GW 785 t 0.3 g 100 km 50% @ 10.4 ly
deceleration stage 60,000 GW 785 t 0.3 g 100 km 50% @ 0.iv ly
Interstellar travel catalog to use photogravitational assists for a total stop [edit]

The post-obit tabular array is based on piece of work by Heller, Hippke and Kervella.[66]

Name Travel fourth dimension
(yr)		 Distance
(ly)		 Luminosity
(L☉)
Sirius A 68.90 8.58 24.twenty
α Centauri A 101.25 4.36 1.52
α Centauri B 147.58 4.36 0.50
Procyon A 154.06 11.44 6.94
Vega 167.39 25.02 fifty.05
Altair 176.67 16.69 10.70
Fomalhaut A 221.33 25.13 sixteen.67
Denebola 325.56 35.78 14.66
Brush A 341.35 50.98 49.85
Epsilon Eridani 363.35 10.fifty 0.50
  • Successive assists at α Cen A and B could allow travel times to 75 yr to both stars.
  • Lightsail has a nominal mass-to-surface ratio (σnom) of viii.half-dozen×x−4 gram k−2 for a nominal graphene-class sail.
  • Expanse of the Lightsail, about tenv thousand2 = (316 m)2
  • Velocity upward to 37,300 km southward−1 (12.5% c)

Pre-accelerated fuel [edit]

Achieving outset-stop interstellar trip times of less than a human being lifetime crave mass-ratios of between 1,000 and ane,000,000, even for the nearer stars. This could exist achieved by multi-staged vehicles on a vast calibration.[48] Alternatively large linear accelerators could propel fuel to fission propelled space-vehicles, avoiding the limitations of the Rocket equation.[67]

Theoretical concepts [edit]

Manual of minds with light [edit]

Uploaded human being minds or AI could be transmitted with laser or radio signals at the speed of lite.[68] This requires a receiver at the destination which would starting time take to be gear up e.k. by humans, probes, self replicating machines (potentially along with AI or uploaded humans), or an alien civilisation (which might also exist in a different galaxy, perhaps a Kardashev type III culture).

Faster-than-light travel [edit]

Scientists and authors have postulated a number of means by which it might be possible to surpass the speed of light, but even the nearly serious-minded of these are highly speculative.[69]

It is besides debatable whether faster-than-light travel is physically possible, in office because of causality concerns: travel faster than light may, nether certain atmospheric condition, permit travel backwards in fourth dimension inside the context of special relativity.[70] Proposed mechanisms for faster-than-light travel inside the theory of general relativity require the existence of exotic thing[69] and it is not known if this could be produced in sufficient quantity.

Alcubierre drive [edit]

In physics, the Alcubierre drive is based on an argument, within the framework of full general relativity and without the introduction of wormholes, that information technology is possible to modify spacetime in a way that allows a spaceship to travel with an arbitrarily large speed by a local expansion of spacetime behind the spaceship and an opposite wrinkle in front of it.[71] Withal, this concept would require the spaceship to comprise a region of exotic matter, or hypothetical concept of negative mass.[71]

Artificial black hole [edit]

A theoretical idea for enabling interstellar travel is by propelling a starship by creating an artificial black pigsty and using a parabolic reflector to reflect its Hawking radiation. Although across current technological capabilities, a black pigsty starship offers some advantages compared to other possible methods. Getting the blackness hole to act as a power source and engine also requires a way to convert the Hawking radiations into free energy and thrust. I potential method involves placing the hole at the focal bespeak of a parabolic reflector attached to the ship, creating forward thrust. A slightly easier, only less efficient method would involve simply absorbing all the gamma radiations heading towards the fore of the send to push button it onwards, and let the remainder shoot out the back.[72] [73] [74]

Wormholes [edit]

Wormholes are conjectural distortions in spacetime that theorists postulate could connect two arbitrary points in the universe, across an Einstein–Rosen Bridge. It is not known whether wormholes are possible in do. Although there are solutions to the Einstein equation of general relativity that allow for wormholes, all of the currently known solutions involve some assumption, for case the existence of negative mass, which may exist unphysical.[75] However, Cramer et al. argue that such wormholes might have been created in the early on universe, stabilized past cosmic strings.[76] The full general theory of wormholes is discussed past Visser in the book Lorentzian Wormholes.[77]

Designs and studies [edit]

Enzmann starship [edit]

The Enzmann starship, as detailed past G. Harry Stine in the October 1973 issue of Analog, was a blueprint for a future starship, based on the ideas of Robert Duncan-Enzmann. The spacecraft itself as proposed used a 12,000,000 ton ball of frozen deuterium to ability 12–24 thermonuclear pulse propulsion units. Twice every bit long every bit the Empire State Building and assembled in-orbit, the spacecraft was office of a larger projection preceded past interstellar probes and telescopic ascertainment of target star systems.[78]

Project Hyperion [edit]

Project Hyperion, one of the projects of Icarus Interstellar has looked into various feasibility issues of crewed interstellar travel.[79] [lxxx] [81] Its members continue to publish on crewed interstellar travel in collaboration with the Initiative for Interstellar Studies.[27]

NASA research [edit]

NASA has been researching interstellar travel since its formation, translating of import strange language papers and conducting early on studies on applying fusion propulsion, in the 1960s, and laser propulsion, in the 1970s, to interstellar travel.

In 1994, NASA and JPL cosponsored a "Workshop on Advanced Breakthrough/Relativity Theory Propulsion" to "institute and use new frames of reference for thinking about the faster-than-calorie-free (FTL) question".[82]

The NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program (terminated in FY 2003 after a half-dozen-year, $1.two-million written report, because "No breakthroughs appear imminent.")[83] identified some breakthroughs that are needed for interstellar travel to be possible.[84]

Geoffrey A. Landis of NASA'south Glenn Research Center states that a laser-powered interstellar sail ship could possibly be launched within 50 years, using new methods of space travel. "I think that ultimately we're going to do it, information technology'due south merely a question of when and who," Landis said in an interview. Rockets are too slow to transport humans on interstellar missions. Instead, he envisions interstellar arts and crafts with all-encompassing sails, propelled past light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation light to about i-tenth the speed of light. It would take such a transport about 43 years to reach Blastoff Centauri if it passed through the system without stopping. Slowing downwardly to stop at Alpha Centauri could increase the trip to 100 years,[85] whereas a journey without slowing down raises the issue of making sufficiently accurate and useful observations and measurements during a fly-past.

100 Year Starship study [edit]

The 100 Year Starship (100YSS) study was the name of a one-yr project to assess the attributes of and lay the groundwork for an organization that can carry forward the 100 Year Starship vision. 100YSS-related symposia were organized between 2011 and 2015.

Harold ("Sonny") White[86] from NASA's Johnson Space Center is a member of Icarus Interstellar,[87] the nonprofit foundation whose mission is to realize interstellar flight before the year 2100. At the 2012 meeting of 100YSS, he reported using a laser to try to warp spacetime past 1 part in 10 one thousand thousand with the aim of helping to make interstellar travel possible.[88]

Other designs [edit]

  • Project Orion, man crewed interstellar transport (1958–1968).
  • Project Daedalus, uncrewed interstellar probe (1973–1978).
  • Starwisp, uncrewed interstellar probe (1985).[89]
  • Project Longshot, uncrewed interstellar probe (1987–1988).
  • Starseed/launcher, fleet of uncrewed interstellar probes (1996)
  • Project Valkyrie, human crewed interstellar ship (2009)
  • Project Icarus, uncrewed interstellar probe (2009–2014).
  • Lord's day-diver, uncrewed interstellar probe[90]
  • Projection Dragonfly, small light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation-propelled interstellar probe (2013-2015).
  • Breakthrough Starshot, armada of uncrewed interstellar probes, announced on Apr 12, 2016.[91] [92] [93]

Non-profit organizations [edit]

A few organisations dedicated to interstellar propulsion research and advocacy for the instance be worldwide. These are still in their infancy, simply are already backed upwards by a membership of a wide diverseness of scientists, students and professionals.

  • Initiative for Interstellar Studies (UK)[94]
  • Tau Goose egg Foundation (USA)[95]

Feasibility [edit]

The energy requirements make interstellar travel very difficult. It has been reported that at the 2008 Joint Propulsion Conference, multiple experts opined that information technology was improbable that humans would ever explore across the Solar Organisation.[96] Brice North. Cassenti, an associate professor with the Department of Engineering and Science at Rensselaer Polytechnic Found, stated that at least 100 times the total energy output of the unabridged earth [in a given year] would exist required to send a probe to the nearest star.[96]

Astrophysicist Sten Odenwald stated that the basic problem is that through intensive studies of thousands of detected exoplanets, almost of the closest destinations within l lite years do not yield Earth-like planets in the star's habitable zones.[97] Given the multitrillion-dollar expense of some of the proposed technologies, travelers will have to spend up to 200 years traveling at xx% the speed of calorie-free to achieve the all-time known destinations. Moreover, once the travelers arrive at their destination (by any means), they will non exist able to travel down to the surface of the target globe and fix a colony unless the atmosphere is non-lethal. The prospect of making such a journey, only to spend the remainder of the colony's life inside a sealed habitat and venturing outside in a spacesuit, may eliminate many prospective targets from the list.

Moving at a speed close to the speed of low-cal and encountering fifty-fifty a tiny stationary object like a grain of sand will take fatal consequences. For instance, a gram of matter moving at xc% of the speed of light contains a kinetic energy corresponding to a small nuclear flop (effectually 30kt TNT).

One of the major stumbling blocks is having plenty Onboard Spares & Repairs facilities for such a lengthy time journey bold all other considerations are solved, without admission to all the resource available on Earth.[98]

Interstellar missions non for man benefit [edit]

Explorative loftier-speed missions to Alpha Centauri, as planned for by the Breakthrough Starshot initiative, are projected to be realizable within the 21st century.[99] It is alternatively possible to program for uncrewed slow-cruising missions taking millennia to arrive. These probes would non be for human benefit in the sense that one tin not foresee whether there would be everyone around on earth interested in then dorsum-transmitted science data. An example would be the Genesis mission,[100] which aims to bring unicellular life, in the spirit of directed panspermia, to habitable but otherwise barren planets.[101] Insufficiently slow cruising Genesis probes, with a typical speed of c / 300 {\displaystyle c/300} , respective to almost 1000 km/s {\displaystyle m\,{\mbox{km/s}}} , can be decelerated using a magnetic sail. Uncrewed missions not for human being benefit would hence exist feasible.[102] For biotic ideals, and their extension to space as panbiotic ethics, it is a human purpose to secure and propagate life and to utilise space to maximize life.

Discovery of Earth-Like planets [edit]

In February 2017, NASA announced that its Spitzer Space Telescope had revealed seven World-size planets in the TRAPPIST-i organization orbiting an ultra-cool dwarf star xl light-years away from the Solar System.[103] Three of these planets are firmly located in the habitable zone, the area around the parent star where a rocky planet is most probable to have liquid water. The discovery sets a new tape for greatest number of habitable-zone planets institute effectually a single star outside the Solar Arrangement. All of these seven planets could have liquid water – the primal to life every bit we know it – under the correct atmospheric atmospheric condition, but the chances are highest with the three in the habitable zone.

See also [edit]

  • Effect of spaceflight on the human body – Medical consequences of spaceflight
  • Health threat from cosmic rays
  • Human spaceflight – Space travel past humans
  • Intergalactic travel – Hypothetical travel betwixt galaxies
  • Interstellar advice – Communication between planetary systems
  • Interstellar object
  • List of nearest terrestrial exoplanet candidates
  • Spacecraft propulsion – Method used to accelerate spacecraft
  • Space travel in science fiction
  • Uploaded astronaut

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b Mauldin, John H. (May 1992). Prospects for interstellar travel . Published for the American Astronautical Gild past Univelt. Interstellar travel.
  2. ^ "Interstellar Travel". www.bis-space.com. Archived from the original on 2017-06-16. Retrieved 2017-06-16 .
  3. ^ Crawford, I. A. (2009). "The Astronomical, Astrobiological and Planetary Science Case for Interstellar Spaceflight". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 62: 415–421. arXiv:1008.4893. Bibcode:2009JBIS...62..415C.
  4. ^ Conclusion of the 2016 Tennessee Valley Interstellar Workshop Infinite Solar Power Working Rail run past Peter Garretson & Robert Kennedy.
  5. ^ Elizabeth Howell (January xix, 2022). "Voyager i: Earth's uttermost spacecraft". Infinite.com . Retrieved 8 Apr 2022.
  6. ^ "A Look at the Scaling". nasa.gov. NASA Glenn Research Heart. 2015-03-xi.
  7. ^ Millis, Marc G. (2011). "Energy, incessant obsolescence, and the first interstellar missions". arXiv:1101.1066.
  8. ^ Zirnstein, Due east.J (2013). "Simulating the Compton-Getting Effect for Hydrogen Flux Measurements: Implications for IBEX-Hi and -Lo Observations". Astrophysical Journal. 778 (2): 112–127. Bibcode:2013ApJ...778..112Z. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/2/112.
  9. ^ Outer Solar Arrangement : prospective free energy and material resources. Badescu, Viorel,, Zacny, Kris. Cham, Switzerland. 2018-04-28. ISBN9783319738451. OCLC 1033673323. {{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  10. ^ a b c Crawford, I. A. (2011). "Project Icarus: A review of local interstellar medium backdrop of relevance for space missions to the nearest stars". Acta Astronautica. 68 (7–8): 691–699. arXiv:1010.4823. Bibcode:2011AcAau..68..691C. doi:ten.1016/j.actaastro.2010.10.016. S2CID 101553.
  11. ^ Westover, Shayne (27 March 2012). Active Radiations Shielding Utilizing Loftier Temperature Superconductors (PDF). NIAC Symposium.
  12. ^ Garrett, Henry (30 July 2012). "In that location and Back Again: A Layman's Guide to Ultra-Reliability for Interstellar Missions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on viii May 2014.
  13. ^ Gibson, Dirk C. (2015). Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Infinite Dangers: Outer Space Perils, Rocket Risks and the Wellness Consequences of the Infinite Environment. Bentham Science Publishers. p. 1. ISBN978-ane-60805-991-1.
  14. ^ a b Forward, Robert L. (1996). "Ad Astra!". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 49 (1): 23–32. Bibcode:1996JBIS...49...23F.
  15. ^ Kennedy, Andrew (July 2006). "Interstellar Travel: The Wait Calculation and the Incentive Trap of Progress". Periodical of the British Interplanetary Society. 59 (7): 239–246. Bibcode:2006JBIS...59..239K.
  16. ^ "Planet eps Eridani b". exoplanet.eu . Retrieved 2011-01-xv .
  17. ^ Astronomers Have Discovered The Closest Potentially Habitable Planet. Yahoo News. December xviii, 2015.
  18. ^ "Iii Planets in Habitable Zone of Nearby Star". eso.org.
  19. ^ Croswell, Ken (3 December 2012). "ScienceShot: Older Vega Mature Enough to Nurture Life". sciencemag.org. Archived from the original on 4 December 2012.
  20. ^ Voyager. Louisiana State Academy: ERIC Clearing House. 1977. p. 12. Retrieved 2015-10-26 .
  21. ^ a b "Project Dragonfly: The case for pocket-sized, laser-propelled, distributed probes". Centauri Dreams . Retrieved 12 June 2015.
  22. ^ Nogrady, Bianca. "The myths and reality about interstellar travel". Retrieved 2017-06-16 .
  23. ^ Daniel H. Wilson. Well-nigh-lightspeed nano spacecraft might be close. msnbc.msn.com.
  24. ^ Kaku, Michio. The Physics of the Impossible. Ballast Books.
  25. ^ Hein, A. M. "How Volition Humans Fly to the Stars?". Retrieved 12 April 2013.
  26. ^ Hein, A. M.; et al. (2012). "World Ships: Architectures & Feasibility Revisited". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 65: 119–133. Bibcode:2012JBIS...65..119H.
  27. ^ a b Hein, A.Grand.; Smith, C.; Marin, F.; Staats, One thousand. (2020). "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale". Acta Futura. 12: 75–104. arXiv:2005.04100. doi:x.5281/zenodo.3747333. S2CID 218571111.
  28. ^ Bond, A.; Martin, A.R. (1984). "World Ships – An Assessment of the Engineering Feasibility". Journal of the British Interplanetary Gild. 37: 254–266. Bibcode:1984JBIS...37..254B.
  29. ^ Frisbee, R.H. (2009). Limits of Interstellar Flying Engineering science in Frontiers of Propulsion Science. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics.
  30. ^ Hein, Andreas M. "Project Hyperion: The Hollow Asteroid Starship – Dissemination of an Idea". Archived from the original on 10 April 2013. Retrieved 12 Apr 2013.
  31. ^ "Various articles on hibernation". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 59: 81–144. 2006.
  32. ^ Crowl, A.; Chase, J.; Hein, A.M. (2012). "Embryo Space Colonisation to Overcome the Interstellar Time Distance Bottleneck". Journal of the British Interplanetary Gild. 65: 283–285. Bibcode:2012JBIS...65..283C.
  33. ^ "'Island-Hopping' to the Stars". Centauri Dreams . Retrieved 12 June 2015.
  34. ^ a b c d due east f Crawford, I. A. (1990). "Interstellar Travel: A Review for Astronomers". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Guild. 31: 377–400. Bibcode:1990QJRAS..31..377C.
  35. ^ Parkinson, Bradford W.; Spilker, James J. Jr.; Axelrad, Penina; Enge, Per (2014). 18.2.two.1Time Dilation. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. ISBN978-i-56347-106-3 . Retrieved 27 Oct 2015.
  36. ^ "Clock paradox III" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-07-21. Retrieved 2014-08-31 . Taylor, Edwin F.; Wheeler, John Archibald (1966). "Chapter 1 Do 51". Spacetime Physics. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. pp. 97–98. ISBN978-0-7167-0336-5.
  37. ^ Crowell, Benjamin (2011), Light and Matter Section 4.iii
  38. ^ Yagasaki, Kazuyuki (2008). "Invariant Manifolds And Control Of Hyperbolic Trajectories On Infinite- Or Finite-Fourth dimension Intervals". Dynamical Systems. 23 (three): 309–331. doi:10.1080/14689360802263571. S2CID 123409581.
  39. ^ Orth, C. D. (16 May 2003). "VISTA – A Vehicle for Interplanetary Infinite Transport Application Powered by Inertial Confinement Fusion" (PDF). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
  40. ^ Clarke, Arthur C. (1951). The Exploration of Infinite . New York: Harper.
  41. ^ Dawn Of A New Era: The Revolutionary Ion Engine That Took Spacecraft To Ceres
  42. ^ Projection Daedalus: The Propulsion Arrangement Part ane; Theoretical considerations and calculations. two. REVIEW OF Avant-garde PROPULSION SYSTEMS, archived from the original on 2013-06-28
  43. ^ General Dynamics Corp. (January 1964). "Nuclear Pulse Vehicle Study Condensed Summary Report (Full general Dynamics Corp.)" (PDF). U.Southward. Section of Commerce National Technical Data Service.
  44. ^ Freeman J. Dyson (October 1968). "Interstellar Transport". Physics Today. 21 (ten): 41. Bibcode:1968PhT....21j..41D. doi:10.1063/1.3034534.
  45. ^ Cosmos past Carl Sagan
  46. ^ Lenard, Roger X.; Andrews, Dana G. (June 2007). "Use of Mini-Magazine Orion and superconducting coils for near-term interstellar transportation" (PDF). Acta Astronautica. 61 (1–half-dozen): 450–458. Bibcode:2007AcAau..61..450L. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.052. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-06-17. Retrieved 2013-11-24 .
  47. ^ Friedwardt Winterberg (2010). The Release of Thermonuclear Energy past Inertial Confinement. World Scientific. ISBN978-981-4295-91-viii.
  48. ^ a b D.F. Spencer; L.D. Jaffe (1963). "Feasibility of Interstellar Travel". Astronautica Acta. 9: 49–58.
  49. ^ PDF C. R. Williams et al., 'Realizing "2001: A Space Odyssey": Piloted Spherical Torus Nuclear Fusion Propulsion', 2001, 52 pages, NASA Glenn Research Center
  50. ^ "Storing antimatter - CERN". home.web.cern.ch.
  51. ^ "ALPHA Stores Antimatter Atoms Over a Quarter of an Hour – and Notwithstanding Counting - Berkeley Lab". v June 2011.
  52. ^ Rouaud, Mathieu (2020). Interstellar travel and antimatter (PDF). ISBN9782954930930.
  53. ^ Winterberg, F. (21 August 2012). "Matter–antimatter gigaelectron volt gamma ray laser rocket propulsion". Acta Astronautica. 81 (ane): 34–39. Bibcode:2012AcAau..81...34W. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.07.001.
  54. ^ Landis, Geoffrey A. (29 August 1994). Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation-powered Interstellar Probe. Briefing on Practical Robotic Interstellar Flight. NY University, New York, NY. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013.
  55. ^ A. Bolonkin (2005). Non Rocket Space Launch and Flight. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-044731-5
  56. ^ "NASA Squad Claims 'Impossible' Space Engine Works—Become the Facts". National Geographic News. 2016-11-21. Retrieved 2019-11-12 .
  57. ^ "Roger SHAWYER -- EM Space Drive -- Articles & Patent". rexresearch.com . Retrieved 2019-11-12 .
  58. ^ McRae, Mike. "The Latest Test on The 'Impossible' EM Drive Concludes Information technology Doesn't Piece of work". ScienceAlert . Retrieved 2019-11-12 .
  59. ^ Starr, Michelle. "NASA Engineer Claims 'Helical Engine' Concept Could Achieve 99% The Speed of Light Without Propellant". ScienceAlert . Retrieved 2019-11-12 .
  60. ^ Forward, R.L. (1984). "Roundtrip Interstellar Travel Using Laser-Pushed Lightsails". J Spacecraft. 21 (2): 187–195. Bibcode:1984JSpRo..21..187F. doi:10.2514/3.8632.
  61. ^ "Alpha Centauri: Our Commencement Target for Interstellar Probes" – via go.galegroup.com.
  62. ^ Delbert, Caroline (2020-12-09). "The Radical Spacecraft That Could Transport Humans to a Habitable Exoplanet". Popular Mechanics . Retrieved 2020-12-12 .
  63. ^ Andrews, Dana M.; Zubrin, Robert M. (1990). "Magnetic Sails and Interstellar Travel" (PDF). Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 43: 265–272. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-12. Retrieved 2014-10-08 .
  64. ^ Zubrin, Robert; Martin, Andrew (1999-08-11). "NIAC Study of the Magnetic Sail" (PDF) . Retrieved 2014-10-08 .
  65. ^ Landis, Geoffrey A. (2003). "The Ultimate Exploration: A Review of Propulsion Concepts for Interstellar Flight". In Yoji Kondo; Frederick Bruhweiler; John H. Moore, Charles Sheffield (eds.). Interstellar Travel and Multi-Generation Space Ships. Apogee Books. p. 52. ISBN978-1-896522-99-9.
  66. ^ Heller, René; Hippke, Michael; Kervella, Pierre (2017). "Optimized trajectories to the nearest stars using lightweight loftier-velocity photon sails". The Astronomical Journal. 154 (3): 115. arXiv:1704.03871. Bibcode:2017AJ....154..115H. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa813f. S2CID 119070263.
  67. ^ Roger X. Lenard; Ronald J. Lipinski (2000). "Interstellar rendezvous missions employing fission propulsion systems". AIP Conference Proceedings. 504: 1544–1555. Bibcode:2000AIPC..504.1544L. doi:x.1063/1.1290979.
  68. ^ "Michio Kaku foretells humanity'south boggling future". NBC News. We're going to have the Man Connectome Project map the human encephalon before the end of this century, I think. We're going to put the connectome on a laser beam and shoot it to the moon. In i second, our consciousness is on the moon. In 20 minutes we're on Mars, viii hours we're on Pluto, in four years our consciousness has reached the nearest star.
  69. ^ a b Crawford, Ian A. (1995). "Some thoughts on the implications of faster-than-light interstellar space travel". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Gild. 36: 205–218. Bibcode:1995QJRAS..36..205C.
  70. ^ Feinberg, 1000. (1967). "Possibility of faster-than-light particles". Physical Review. 159 (v): 1089–1105. Bibcode:1967PhRv..159.1089F. doi:10.1103/physrev.159.1089.
  71. ^ a b Alcubierre, Miguel (1994). "The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within full general relativity". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 11 (five): L73–L77. arXiv:gr-qc/0009013. Bibcode:1994CQGra..11L..73A. CiteSeerX10.1.1.338.8690. doi:x.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001. S2CID 4797900.
  72. ^ "Are Black Hole Starships Possible?", Louis Crane, Shawn Westmoreland, 2009
  73. ^ Chown, Marcus (25 November 2009). "Dark power: Grand designs for interstellar travel". New Scientist (2736). (subscription required)
  74. ^ A Black Hole Engine That Could Power Spaceships. Tim Barribeau, November 4, 2009.
  75. ^ "Ideas Based On What We'd Like To Achieve: Worm Hole transportation". NASA Glenn Research Heart. 11 March 2015.
  76. ^ John G. Cramer; Robert L. Forward; Michael Southward. Morris; Matt Visser; Gregory Benford; Geoffrey A. Landis (15 March 1995). "Natural Wormholes as Gravitational Lenses". Physical Review D. 51 (3117): 3117–3120. arXiv:ph/9409051. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.3117C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.3117. PMID 10018782. S2CID 42837620.
  77. ^ Visser, M. (1995). Lorentzian Wormholes: from Einstein to Hawking. AIP Press, Woodbury NY. ISBN978-ane-56396-394-0.
  78. ^ Gilster, Paul (April 1, 2007). "A Note on the Enzmann Starship". Centauri Dreams.
  79. ^ "Icarus Interstellar – Projection Hyperion". Retrieved xiii Apr 2013.
  80. ^ Hein, Andreas; et al. (January 2012). "World Ships – Architectures & Feasibility Revisited". Retrieved 7 Feb 2013.
  81. ^ Smith, Cameron M (2014). "Estimation of a genetically viable population for multigenerational interstellar voyaging: Review and information for project Hyperion". Acta Astronautica. 97: 16–29. Bibcode:2014AcAau..97...16S. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.12.013.
  82. ^ Bennett, Gary; Forward, Robert; Frisbee, Robert (ten July 1995). "Report on the NASA/JPL Workshop on avant-garde quantum/relativity theory propulsion". 31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/six.1995-2599. Retrieved viii September 2020.
  83. ^ "Breakthrough Propulsion Physics" project at NASA Glenn Research Eye, Nov xix, 2008
  84. ^ http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/engineering science/warp/warp.html Warp Drive, When? Breakthrough Technologies January 26, 2009
  85. ^ "Archived copy". Infinite.com. Archived from the original on 2009-03-27. Retrieved 2009-04-03 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived re-create as title (link) Malik, Tariq, "Sex activity and Society Aboard the First Starships." Science Tuesday, Space.com March xix, 2002.
  86. ^ "Dr. Harold "Sonny" White – Icarus Interstellar". icarusinterstellar.org. Archived from the original on one June 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
  87. ^ "Icarus Interstellar – A nonprofit foundation defended to achieving interstellar flying by 2100". icarusinterstellar.org. Archived from the original on two Dec 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
  88. ^ Moskowitz, Clara (17 September 2012). "Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Idea, Scientists Say". space.com.
  89. ^ Forward, R. 50. (May–June 1985). "Starwisp – An ultra-light interstellar probe". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 22 (iii): 345–350. Bibcode:1985JSpRo..22..345F. doi:10.2514/3.25754.
  90. ^ Benford, James; Benford, Gregory (2003). "Nigh-Term Beamed Sail Propulsion Missions: Cosmos-1 and Sun-Diver" (PDF). Beamed Energy Propulsion. Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine. 664: 358. Bibcode:2003AIPC..664..358B. doi:10.1063/1.1582124. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-24.
  91. ^ "Breakthrough Starshot". Breakthrough Initiatives. 12 April 2016. Retrieved 2016-04-12 .
  92. ^ Starshot – Concept.
  93. ^ "Breakthrough Initiatives". breakthroughinitiatives.org.
  94. ^ Webpole Bt. "Initiative For Interstellar Studies". i4is.org . Retrieved 12 June 2015.
  95. ^ "Pioneering Interstellar Flight - Tau Naught Foundation".
  96. ^ a b O'Neill, Ian (Aug 19, 2008). "Interstellar travel may remain in science fiction". Universe Today.
  97. ^ Odenwald, Sten (April 2, 2015). "Interstellar travel: Where should we go?". Huffington Post Weblog.
  98. ^ "Interstellar Travel as Delusional Fantasy [Excerpt]". Scientific American.
  99. ^ Kulkarni, Neeraj; Lubin, Philip; Zhang, Qicheng (2017). "Relativistic Spacecraft Propelled by Directed Energy". The Astronomical Journal. 155 (iv): 155. arXiv:1710.10732. Bibcode:2018AJ....155..155K. doi:ten.3847/1538-3881/aaafd2. S2CID 62839612.
  100. ^ Gros, Claudius (5 September 2016). "Developing ecospheres on transiently habitable planets: the genesis project". Astrophysics and Space Science. 361 (10): 324. arXiv:1608.06087. Bibcode:2016Ap&SS.361..324G. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2911-0. S2CID 6106567.
  101. ^ How to Jumpstart Life Elsewhere in Our Galaxy, The Atlantic, 08-25-17.
  102. ^ Should we seed life through the cosmos using laser-driven ships?, New Scientist, 11-13-17.
  103. ^ "NASA Printing Release Feb 22nd 2017". 22 February 2017.

Further reading [edit]

  • Crawford, Ian A. (1990). "Interstellar Travel: A Review for Astronomers". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Order. 31: 377–400. Bibcode:1990QJRAS..31..377C.
  • Hein, A.M. (September 2012). "Evaluation of Technological-Social and Political Projections for the Side by side 100-300 Years and the Implications for an Interstellar Mission". Periodical of the British Interplanetary Society. 33 (9/10): 330–340. Bibcode:2012JBIS...65..330H.
  • Long, Kelvin (2012). Deep Space Propulsion: A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight. Springer. ISBN978-1-4614-0606-8.
  • Mallove, Eugene (1989). The Starflight Handbook . John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN978-0-471-61912-3.
  • Odenwald, Sten (2015). Interstellar Travel: An Astronomer's Guide. ISBN978-1-5120-5627-3.
  • Woodward, James (2013). Making Starships and Stargates: The Science of Interstellar Transport and Absurdly Benign Wormholes. Springer. ISBN978-1-4614-5622-three.
  • Zubrin, Robert (1999). Entering Space: Creating a Spacefaring Civilization . Tarcher / Putnam. ISBN978-ane-58542-036-0.

External links [edit]

  • Leonard David – Reaching for interstellar flight (2003) – MSNBC (MSNBC Webpage)
  • NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Programme (NASA Webpage)
  • Bibliography of Interstellar Flight (source list)
  • DARPA seeks help for interstellar starship Archived 2014-03-04 at the Wayback Auto
  • How to build a starship – and why we should commencement thinking well-nigh it now (Article from The Chat, 2016)

0 Response to "What Is the Fastest We Could Travel in Space"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel