Home  ›  How Far Can a 22 Shell Travel

How Far Can a 22 Shell Travel

Written By Sunday, May 8, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Concept of moving between different points in time

Time travel is the concept of movement between sure points in time, coordinating to movement betwixt different points in space by an object or a person, typically with the use of a hypothetical device known equally a time motorcar. Time travel is a widely recognized concept in philosophy and fiction, particularly science fiction. The idea of a time auto was popularized by H. G. Wells' 1895 novel The Fourth dimension Machine.[1]

It is uncertain if time travel to the past is physically possible, and such travel, if at all feasible, may give rise to questions of causality. Frontwards fourth dimension travel, outside the usual sense of the perception of time, is an extensively observed phenomenon and well-understood inside the framework of special relativity and general relativity. However, making one body advance or delay more a few milliseconds compared to another body is not feasible with electric current technology. Every bit for backward fourth dimension travel, it is possible to find solutions in general relativity that let for it, such as a rotating blackness pigsty. Traveling to an arbitrary point in spacetime has very express back up in theoretical physics, and is ordinarily connected just with breakthrough mechanics or wormholes.

History of the fourth dimension travel concept

Some aboriginal myths depict a character skipping forrard in time. In Hindu mythology, the Vishnu Purana mentions the story of King Raivata Kakudmi, who travels to heaven to meet the creator Brahma and is surprised to learn when he returns to Earth that many ages take passed.[ii] [3] The Buddhist Pāli Canon mentions the relativity of fourth dimension. The Payasi Sutta tells of one of the Buddha's main disciples, Kumara Kassapa, who explains to the skeptic Payasi that time in the Heavens passes differently than on Earth.[4] The Japanese tale of "Urashima Tarō",[five] offset described in the Manyoshu tells of a young fisherman named Urashima-no-ko (浦嶋子) who visits an undersea palace. Subsequently 3 days, he returns dwelling house to his village and finds himself 300 years in the future, where he has been forgotten, his house is in ruins, and his family has died.[6] In Jewish tradition, the 1st-century BC scholar Honi ha-M'agel is said to have fallen asleep and slept for seventy years. When waking upwardly he returned home but found none of the people he knew, and no one believed his claims of who he was.[vii]

Shift to science fiction

Early science fiction stories feature characters who sleep for years and awaken in a changed society, or are transported to the past through supernatural means. Among them L'An 2440, rêve s'il en fût jamais (The Year 2440: A Dream If Ever There Was Ane, 1770) by Louis-Sébastien Mercier, Rip Van Winkle (1819) by Washington Irving, Looking Backward (1888) by Edward Bellamy, and When the Sleeper Awakes (1899) by H.G. Wells. Prolonged sleep, like the later more than familiar time machine, is used every bit a means of time travel in these stories.[8]

The earliest piece of work almost backwards fourth dimension travel is uncertain. The Chinese novel Supplement to the Journey to the West (c. 1640) by Dong Yue features magical mirrors and jade gateways that connect various points in time. The protagonist Sun Wukong travels dorsum in time to the "Globe of the Ancients" (Qin Dynasty) to retrieve a magical bell and and then travels forwards to the "World of the Hereafter" (Song Dynasty) to find an emperor who has been exiled in time. However, the fourth dimension travel takes identify inside an illusory dream world created by the villain to entrap and distract him.[nine] Samuel Madden's Memoirs of the Twentieth Century (1733) is a serial of letters from British ambassadors in 1997 and 1998 to diplomats in the past, carrying the political and religious conditions of the time to come.[x] : 95–96 Because the narrator receives these letters from his guardian angel, Paul Alkon suggests in his volume Origins of Futuristic Fiction that "the beginning time-traveler in English literature is a guardian affections".[ten] : 85 Madden does not explain how the angel obtains these documents, simply Alkon asserts that Madden "deserves recognition every bit the offset to toy with the rich idea of time-travel in the form of an antiquity sent backward from the future to exist discovered in the present".[10] : 95–96 In the science fiction anthology Far Boundaries (1951), editor August Derleth claims that an early on short story about time travel is Missing One'southward Coach: An Anachronism, written for the Dublin Literary Mag [xi] by an bearding writer in 1838.[12] : 3 While the narrator waits nether a tree for a coach to accept him out of Newcastle upon Tyne, he is transported back in time over a yard years. He encounters the Venerable Bede in a monastery and explains to him the developments of the coming centuries. However, the story never makes it articulate whether these events are existent or a dream.[12] : eleven–38 Some other early work about fourth dimension travel is The Forebears of Kalimeros: Alexander, son of Philip of Macedon by Alexander Veltman published in 1836.[xiii]

Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol (1843) has early depictions of mystical time travel in both directions, as the protagonist, Ebenezer Scrooge, is transported to Christmases past and future. Other stories utilise the same template, where a grapheme naturally goes to sleep, and upon waking up finds themself in a different time.[14] A clearer case of astern time travel is establish in the pop 1861 book Paris avant les hommes (Paris earlier Men) past the French botanist and geologist Pierre Boitard, published posthumously. In this story, the protagonist is transported to the prehistoric by past the magic of a "lame demon" (a French pun on Boitard's name), where he encounters a Plesiosaur and an apelike ancestor and is able to interact with ancient creatures.[15] Edward Everett Hale's "Easily Off" (1881) tells the story of an unnamed existence, mayhap the soul of a person who has recently died, who interferes with ancient Egyptian history by preventing Joseph'southward enslavement. This may have been the first story to feature an alternate history created every bit a result of time travel.[16] : 54

Early on time machines

One of the first stories to feature time travel by means of a car is "The Clock that Went Backward" by Edward Page Mitchell,[17] which appeared in the New York Sun in 1881. However, the mechanism borders on fantasy. An unusual clock, when wound, runs backwards and transports people nearby back in fourth dimension. The writer does not explicate the origin or backdrop of the clock.[xvi] : 55 Enrique Gaspar y Rimbau'south El Anacronópete (1887) may have been the first story to characteristic a vessel engineered to travel through time.[18] [19] Andrew Sawyer has commented that the story "does seem to be the first literary clarification of a time machine noted and then far", adding that "Edward Folio Mitchell's story 'The Clock That Went Astern' (1881) is usually described every bit the start time-motorcar story, but I'm not sure that a clock quite counts".[20] H. G. Wells' The Time Car (1895) popularized the concept of fourth dimension travel by mechanical means.[21]

Fourth dimension travel in physics

Some theories, most notably special and general relativity, suggest that suitable geometries of spacetime or specific types of motion in infinite might allow fourth dimension travel into the past and future if these geometries or motions were possible.[22] : 499 In technical papers, physicists discuss the possibility of closed timelike curves, which are earth lines that form airtight loops in spacetime, assuasive objects to render to their own past. There are known to be solutions to the equations of general relativity that describe spacetimes which contain airtight timelike curves, such every bit Gödel spacetime, simply the physical plausibility of these solutions is uncertain.

Many in the scientific community believe that astern time travel is highly unlikely. Any theory that would allow time travel would introduce potential problems of causality.[23] The classic example of a problem involving causality is the "grandad paradox": what if ane were to become back in time and kill one's own grandfather before one's father was conceived? Some physicists, such every bit Novikov and Deutsch, suggested that these sorts of temporal paradoxes can be avoided through the Novikov cocky-consistency principle or a variation of the many-worlds interpretation with interacting worlds.[24]

General relativity

Time travel to the past is theoretically possible in certain full general relativity spacetime geometries that permit traveling faster than the speed of light, such every bit cosmic strings, traversable wormholes, and Alcubierre drives.[25] [26] : 33–130 The theory of full general relativity does advise a scientific basis for the possibility of backward time travel in certain unusual scenarios, although arguments from semiclassical gravity suggest that when quantum effects are incorporated into general relativity, these loopholes may be closed.[27] These semiclassical arguments led Stephen Hawking to formulate the chronology protection conjecture, suggesting that the fundamental laws of nature prevent time travel,[28] but physicists cannot come to a definite judgment on the issue without a theory of breakthrough gravity to bring together breakthrough mechanics and full general relativity into a completely unified theory.[29] [30] : 150

Unlike spacetime geometries

The theory of general relativity describes the universe under a system of field equations that determine the metric, or distance office, of spacetime. There exist verbal solutions to these equations that include closed time-like curves, which are world lines that intersect themselves; some point in the causal future of the world line is also in its causal past, a situation that can exist described as time travel. Such a solution was beginning proposed past Kurt Gödel, a solution known as the Gödel metric, simply his (and others') solution requires the universe to have physical characteristics that information technology does non appear to take,[22] : 499 such as rotation and lack of Hubble expansion. Whether general relativity forbids airtight fourth dimension-like curves for all realistic conditions is still beingness researched.[31]

Wormholes

Wormholes are a hypothetical warped spacetime permitted by the Einstein field equations of general relativity.[32] : 100 A proposed fourth dimension-travel machine using a traversable wormhole would hypothetically work in the following mode: Ane cease of the wormhole is accelerated to some significant fraction of the speed of calorie-free, perchance with some advanced propulsion system, and then brought dorsum to the betoken of origin. Alternatively, another way is to accept one entrance of the wormhole and move it to inside the gravitational field of an object that has higher gravity than the other entrance, and and then return it to a position near the other entrance. For both these methods, fourth dimension dilation causes the finish of the wormhole that has been moved to have anile less, or become "younger", than the stationary end equally seen by an external observer; still, time connects differently through the wormhole than exterior it, so that synchronized clocks at either end of the wormhole will e'er remain synchronized equally seen by an observer passing through the wormhole, no affair how the 2 ends move around.[22] : 502 This ways that an observer inbound the "younger" end would exit the "older" end at a time when information technology was the aforementioned age as the "younger" end, effectively going back in time as seen by an observer from the outside. 1 meaning limitation of such a time car is that it is only possible to get as far back in time equally the initial creation of the automobile;[22] : 503 in essence, information technology is more of a path through time than it is a device that itself moves through fourth dimension, and it would not allow the applied science itself to be moved astern in time.

According to current theories on the nature of wormholes, structure of a traversable wormhole would crave the existence of a substance with negative energy, often referred to equally "exotic affair". More technically, the wormhole spacetime requires a distribution of free energy that violates various energy conditions, such as the aught energy status along with the weak, stiff, and dominant energy weather. However, it is known that quantum effects can atomic number 82 to modest measurable violations of the goose egg free energy condition,[32] : 101 and many physicists believe that the required negative free energy may really be possible due to the Casimir effect in quantum physics.[33] Although early calculations suggested that a very large amount of negative energy would be required, after calculations showed that the amount of negative energy can be fabricated arbitrarily small-scale.[34]

In 1993, Matt Visser argued that the two mouths of a wormhole with such an induced clock difference could not be brought together without inducing quantum field and gravitational effects that would either brand the wormhole plummet or the two mouths repel each other.[35] Considering of this, the two mouths could not exist brought close enough for causality violation to take place. However, in a 1997 paper, Visser hypothesized that a complex "Roman band" (named after Tom Roman) configuration of an N number of wormholes bundled in a symmetric polygon could even so act as a time machine, although he concludes that this is more likely a flaw in classical quantum gravity theory rather than proof that causality violation is possible.[36]

Other approaches based on full general relativity

Another approach involves a dense spinning cylinder unremarkably referred to as a Tipler cylinder, a GR solution discovered past Willem Jacob van Stockum[37] in 1936 and Kornel Lanczos[38] in 1924, but not recognized as assuasive closed timelike curves[39] : 21 until an analysis by Frank Tipler[40] in 1974. If a cylinder is infinitely long and spins fast enough about its long axis, then a spaceship flight around the cylinder on a spiral path could travel dorsum in time (or forrad, depending on the management of its spiral). However, the density and speed required is so great that ordinary matter is not strong enough to construct it. A similar device might be built from a cosmic cord, only none are known to exist, and information technology does non seem to be possible to create a new cosmic string. Physicist Ronald Mallett is attempting to recreate the weather of a rotating black hole with band lasers, in order to bend spacetime and permit for time travel.[41]

A more fundamental objection to time travel schemes based on rotating cylinders or catholic strings has been put frontwards by Stephen Hawking, who proved a theorem showing that co-ordinate to full general relativity it is incommunicable to build a time machine of a special type (a "time machine with the compactly generated Cauchy horizon") in a region where the weak energy status is satisfied, meaning that the region contains no matter with negative free energy density (exotic affair). Solutions such as Tipler's assume cylinders of space length, which are easier to analyze mathematically, and although Tipler suggested that a finite cylinder might produce closed timelike curves if the rotation charge per unit were fast plenty,[39] : 169 he did non testify this. Simply Hawking points out that because of his theorem, "it can't exist done with positive energy density everywhere! I can testify that to build a finite time car, you need negative energy."[30] : 96 This upshot comes from Hawking'south 1992 paper on the chronology protection conjecture, where he examines "the case that the causality violations appear in a finite region of spacetime without curvature singularities" and proves that "in that location will be a Cauchy horizon that is compactly generated and that in general contains ane or more than closed null geodesics which volition be incomplete. I can define geometrical quantities that measure the Lorentz boost and area increment on going round these closed null geodesics. If the causality violation developed from a noncompact initial surface, the averaged weak energy status must be violated on the Cauchy horizon."[28] This theorem does not rule out the possibility of time travel past means of time machines with the non-compactly generated Cauchy horizons (such as the Deutsch-Politzer time auto) or in regions which contain exotic matter, which would exist used for traversable wormholes or the Alcubierre drive and black hole.

Quantum physics

No-communication theorem

When a signal is sent from i location and received at another location, then as long as the signal is moving at the speed of lite or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity in the theory of relativity show that all reference frames agree that the transmission-issue happened before the reception-event. When the point travels faster than calorie-free, information technology is received before it is sent, in all reference frames.[42] The signal could exist said to have moved backward in time. This hypothetical scenario is sometimes referred to as a tachyonic antitelephone.[43]

Breakthrough-mechanical phenomena such as quantum teleportation, the EPR paradox, or quantum entanglement might appear to create a mechanism that allows for faster-than-light (FTL) communication or time travel, and in fact some interpretations of quantum mechanics such equally the Bohm interpretation presume that some information is being exchanged between particles instantaneously in guild to maintain correlations between particles.[44] This effect was referred to every bit "spooky action at a distance" past Einstein.

Nevertheless, the fact that causality is preserved in breakthrough mechanics is a rigorous event in modern quantum field theories, and therefore modern theories do non allow for time travel or FTL communication. In whatever specific instance where FTL has been claimed, more detailed analysis has proven that to get a betoken, some form of classical communication must likewise be used.[45] The no-communication theorem also gives a full general proof that quantum entanglement cannot be used to transmit data faster than classical signals.

Interacting many-worlds interpretation

A variation of Hugh Everett's many-worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics provides a resolution to the grandfather paradox that involves the time traveler arriving in a different universe than the one they came from; it's been argued that since the traveler arrives in a different universe's history and non their own history, this is not "genuine" time travel.[46] The accepted many-worlds estimation suggests that all possible quantum events can occur in mutually exclusive histories.[47] Nevertheless, some variations allow different universes to interact. This concept is virtually often used in science-fiction, but some physicists such as David Deutsch have suggested that a time traveler should finish up in a different history than the ane he started from.[48] [49] On the other hand, Stephen Hawking has argued that fifty-fifty if the MWI is correct, we should expect each time traveler to feel a single cocky-consequent history, so that time travelers remain inside their own world rather than traveling to a unlike 1.[50] The physicist Allen Everett argued that Deutsch'south arroyo "involves modifying key principles of quantum mechanics; it certainly goes beyond simply adopting the MWI". Everett also argues that even if Deutsch's approach is right, information technology would imply that any macroscopic object equanimous of multiple particles would be split up autonomously when traveling back in time through a wormhole, with different particles emerging in different worlds.[24]

Experimental results

Sure experiments carried out give the impression of reversed causality, but fail to testify it nether closer examination.

The delayed pick quantum eraser experiment performed by Marlan Scully involves pairs of entangled photons that are divided into "point photons" and "idler photons", with the signal photons emerging from one of two locations and their position later on measured equally in the double-slit experiment. Depending on how the idler photon is measured, the experimenter can either learn which of the two locations the signal photon emerged from or "erase" that information. Even though the bespeak photons can be measured before the pick has been made about the idler photons, the choice seems to retroactively determine whether or not an interference blueprint is observed when one correlates measurements of idler photons to the respective betoken photons. Withal, since interference tin can be observed only after the idler photons are measured and they are correlated with the signal photons, there is no style for experimenters to tell what choice volition be fabricated in advance just by looking at the signal photons, only by gathering classical information from the entire system; thus causality is preserved.[51]

The experiment of Lijun Wang might also show causality violation since it made it possible to send packages of waves through a bulb of caesium gas in such a mode that the package appeared to go out the bulb 62 nanoseconds before its entry, but a wave package is non a single well-divers object but rather a sum of multiple waves of different frequencies (meet Fourier analysis), and the parcel can appear to motion faster than low-cal or fifty-fifty backward in fourth dimension even if none of the pure waves in the sum do so. This event cannot exist used to send whatever thing, energy, or information faster than light,[52] and so this experiment is understood not to violate causality either.

The physicists Günter Nimtz and Alfons Stahlhofen, of the University of Koblenz, merits to have violated Einstein'southward theory of relativity past transmitting photons faster than the speed of calorie-free. They say they have conducted an experiment in which microwave photons traveled "instantaneously" betwixt a pair of prisms that had been moved up to three ft (0.91 thou) apart, using a miracle known as quantum tunneling. Nimtz told New Scientist mag: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of." Nonetheless, other physicists say that this phenomenon does not allow data to be transmitted faster than light. Aephraim Steinberg, a quantum eyes expert at the Academy of Toronto, Canada, uses the analogy of a railroad train traveling from Chicago to New York, only dropping off train cars at each station along the fashion, and then that the center of the train moves forward at each terminate; in this way, the speed of the heart of the train exceeds the speed of any of the individual cars.[53]

Shengwang Du claims in a peer-reviewed journal to have observed unmarried photons' precursors, saying that they travel no faster than c in a vacuum. His experiment involved slow lite besides as passing calorie-free through a vacuum. He generated ii single photons, passing one through rubidium atoms that had been cooled with a laser (thus slowing the light) and passing one through a vacuum. Both times, manifestly, the precursors preceded the photons' main bodies, and the precursor traveled at c in a vacuum. According to Du, this implies that there is no possibility of light traveling faster than c and, thus, no possibility of violating causality.[54]

Absence of time travelers from the future

Many have argued that the absence of time travelers from the future demonstrates that such technology will never be developed, suggesting that it is impossible. This is analogous to the Fermi paradox related to the absence of prove of extraterrestrial life. As the absenteeism of extraterrestrial visitors does non categorically prove they do not exist, and so the absence of time travelers fails to bear witness time travel is physically impossible; it might be that fourth dimension travel is physically possible but is never developed or is cautiously used. Carl Sagan in one case suggested the possibility that fourth dimension travelers could be here simply are disguising their beingness or are not recognized as time travelers.[29] Some versions of general relativity advise that time travel might only exist possible in a region of spacetime that is warped a certain way[ description needed ], and hence fourth dimension travelers would not be able to travel back to before regions in spacetime, before this region existed. Stephen Hawking stated that this would explain why the world has not already been overrun by "tourists from the future".[50]

Advertisement placed in a 1980 edition of Artforum, advert the Krononauts result

Several experiments have been carried out to try to entice future humans, who might invent fourth dimension travel technology, to come back and demonstrate information technology to people of the present time. Events such as Perth'due south Destination Day or MIT'due south Time Traveler Convention heavily publicized permanent "advertisements" of a meeting fourth dimension and place for future time travelers to meet.[55] In 1982, a grouping in Baltimore, Maryland, identifying itself every bit the Krononauts, hosted an event of this type welcoming visitors from the future.[56] [57] These experiments simply stood the possibility of generating a positive issue demonstrating the existence of time travel, only take failed so far—no fourth dimension travelers are known to have attended either event. Some versions of the many-worlds interpretation tin can be used to advise that future humans accept traveled back in time, merely have traveled dorsum to the meeting fourth dimension and place in a parallel universe.[58]

Time dilation

Transversal fourth dimension dilation. The blue dots correspond a pulse of light. Each pair of dots with light "bouncing" betwixt them is a clock. For each group of clocks, the other group appears to be ticking more than slowly, because the moving clock's light pulse has to travel a larger distance than the stationary clock's light pulse. That is and so, fifty-fifty though the clocks are identical and their relative motion is perfectly reciprocal.

There is a dandy deal of appreciable prove for time dilation in special relativity[59] and gravitational time dilation in full general relativity,[60] [61] [62] for example in the famous and like shooting fish in a barrel-to-replicate observation of atmospheric muon decay.[63] [64] [65] The theory of relativity states that the speed of light is invariant for all observers in whatsoever frame of reference; that is, it is always the same. Time dilation is a direct issue of the invariance of the speed of light.[65] Time dilation may be regarded in a limited sense as "time travel into the future": a person may use time dilation so that a small-scale corporeality of proper fourth dimension passes for them, while a large corporeality of proper time passes elsewhere. This can be achieved by traveling at relativistic speeds or through the furnishings of gravity.[66]

For 2 identical clocks moving relative to each other without accelerating, each clock measures the other to exist ticking slower. This is possible due to the relativity of simultaneity. Withal, the symmetry is broken if i clock accelerates, assuasive for less proper time to pass for one clock than the other. The twin paradox describes this: one twin remains on Globe, while the other undergoes acceleration to relativistic speed as they travel into infinite, plow around, and travel dorsum to Earth; the traveling twin ages less than the twin who stayed on Globe, considering of the time dilation experienced during their acceleration. Full general relativity treats the effects of acceleration and the effects of gravity as equivalent, and shows that time dilation likewise occurs in gravity wells, with a clock deeper in the well ticking more slowly; this effect is taken into account when calibrating the clocks on the satellites of the Global Positioning Arrangement, and it could lead to significant differences in rates of crumbling for observers at different distances from a large gravity well such as a black hole.[26] : 33–130

A time machine that utilizes this principle might be, for instance, a spherical crush with a diameter of v meters and the mass of Jupiter. A person at its center will travel forward in time at a rate four times slower than that of distant observers. Squeezing the mass of a large planet into such a modest structure is not expected to be within humanity's technological capabilities in the near future.[26] : 76–140 With electric current technologies, it is only possible to cause a human being traveler to age less than companions on Earth past a few milliseconds afterwards a few hundred days of space travel.[67]

Philosophy

Philosophers have discussed the nature of time since at to the lowest degree the fourth dimension of aboriginal Greece; for example, Parmenides presented the view that fourth dimension is an illusion. Centuries afterwards, Isaac Newton supported the idea of absolute time, while his contemporary Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz maintained that time is simply a relation between events and information technology cannot be expressed independently. The latter approach eventually gave ascent to the spacetime of relativity.[68]

Presentism vs. eternalism

Many philosophers have argued that relativity implies eternalism, the thought that the past and futurity exist in a real sense, not merely as changes that occurred or will occur to the nowadays.[69] Philosopher of science Dean Rickles disagrees with some qualifications, but notes that "the consensus amidst philosophers seems to be that special and general relativity are incompatible with presentism".[70] Some philosophers view time as a dimension equal to spatial dimensions, that future events are "already there" in the same sense different places exist, and that there is no objective flow of fourth dimension; however, this view is disputed.[71]

The bar and ring paradox is an instance of the relativity of simultaneity. Both ends of the bar pass through the ring simultaneously in the rest frame of the band (left), but the ends of the bar pass one after the other in the remainder frame of the bar (right).

Presentism is a school of philosophy that holds that the hereafter and the past exist only as changes that occurred or will occur to the nowadays, and they have no real existence of their own. In this view, fourth dimension travel is impossible considering there is no hereafter or past to travel to.[69] Keller and Nelson have argued that even if past and future objects do not exist, there can still be definite truths about past and futurity events, and thus information technology is possible that a future truth about a fourth dimension traveler deciding to travel dorsum to the present engagement could explain the time traveler's bodily advent in the present;[72] these views are contested by some authors.[73]

Presentism in classical spacetime deems that simply the present exists; this is not reconcilable with special relativity, shown in the following instance: Alice and Bob are simultaneous observers of event O. For Alice, some event Eastward is simultaneous with O, but for Bob, effect E is in the past or future. Therefore, Alice and Bob disagree about what exists in the nowadays, which contradicts classical presentism. "Here-now presentism" attempts to reconcile this by only acknowledging the time and space of a unmarried point; this is unsatisfactory because objects coming and going from the "here-now" alternate between existent and unreal, in addition to the lack of a privileged "here-at present" that would be the "existent" present. "Relativized presentism" acknowledges that there are infinite frames of reference, each of them having a different prepare of simultaneous events, which makes it impossible to distinguish a single "real" present, and hence either all events in time are real—blurring the difference between presentism and eternalism—or each frame of reference exists in its own reality. Options for presentism in special relativity appear to be wearied, merely Gödel and others suspect presentism may exist valid for some forms of general relativity.[74] Generally, the thought of accented time and space is considered incompatible with general relativity; in that location is no universal truth nearly the absolute position of events which occur at different times, and thus no way to determine which point in space at once is at the universal "aforementioned position" at some other time,[75] and all coordinate systems are on equal footing as given by the principle of diffeomorphism invariance.[76]

The grandpa paradox

A common objection to the idea of traveling back in time is put along in the grandfather paradox or the argument of auto-infanticide.[77] If one were able to become back in time, inconsistencies and contradictions would ensue if the fourth dimension traveler were to change anything; there is a contradiction if the past becomes different from the way information technology is.[78] [79] The paradox is commonly described with a person who travels to the past and kills their own granddaddy, prevents the being of their father or female parent, and therefore their own existence.[29] Philosophers question whether these paradoxes prove fourth dimension travel impossible. Some philosophers answer the paradoxes by arguing that it might exist the case that backward time travel could be possible but that it would be impossible to actually change the past in any manner,[eighty] an idea like to the proposed Novikov self-consistency principle in physics.

Ontological paradox

Compossibility

According to the philosophical theory of compossibility, what tin can happen, for instance in the context of time travel, must be weighed against the context of everything relating to the situation. If the past is a sure fashion, it's not possible for it to exist whatsoever other style. What can happen when a fourth dimension traveler visits the past is limited to what did happen, in guild to forbid logical contradictions.[81]

Self-consistency principle

The Novikov self-consistency principle, named after Igor Dmitrievich Novikov, states that whatever actions taken by a time traveler or by an object that travels back in time were part of history all along, and therefore it is impossible for the fourth dimension traveler to "modify" history in whatsoever manner. The time traveler's actions may be the cause of events in their own past though, which leads to the potential for circular causation, sometimes called a predestination paradox,[82] ontological paradox,[83] or bootstrap paradox.[83] [84] The term bootstrap paradox was popularized by Robert A. Heinlein's story "By His Bootstraps".[85] The Novikov self-consistency principle proposes that the local laws of physics in a region of spacetime containing time travelers cannot be any different from the local laws of physics in whatever other region of spacetime.[86]

The philosopher Kelley 50. Ross argues in "Time Travel Paradoxes"[87] that in a scenario involving a physical object whose world-line or history forms a closed loop in time there can exist a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Ross uses the motion picture Somewhere in Time equally an example of such an ontological paradox, where a watch is given to a person, and sixty years later the same watch is brought back in time and given to the aforementioned grapheme. Ross states that entropy of the watch will increase, and the sentinel carried back in time will be more worn with each repetition of its history. The second law of thermodynamics is understood by modernistic physicists to be a statistical police, so decreasing entropy and non-increasing entropy are non impossible, only improbable. Additionally, entropy statistically increases in systems which are isolated, so non-isolated systems, such as an object, that collaborate with the exterior world, can become less worn and decrease in entropy, and information technology's possible for an object whose world-line forms a airtight loop to exist e'er in the same condition in the same signal of its history.[26] : 23

In 2005, Daniel Greenberger and Karl Svozil proposed that quantum theory gives a model for fourth dimension travel where the past must exist self-consequent.[88] [89]

In fiction

Fourth dimension travel themes in science fiction and the media tin exist grouped into three categories: immutable timeline; mutable timeline; and alternate histories, as in the interacting-many-worlds interpretation.[90] [91] [92] The non-scientific term timeline is often used to refer to all physical events in history, so that where events are changed, the fourth dimension traveler is described as creating a new timeline.[93]

Meet also

Further reading

  • Time Travel: A History - book by James Gleick

References

  1. ^ Cheng, John (2012). Astounding Wonder: Imagining Science and Scientific discipline Fiction in Interwar America (illustrated ed.). Academy of Pennsylvania Press. p. 180. ISBN978-0-8122-0667-8. Excerpt of folio 180
  2. ^ Dowson, John (1879), "Revati", A classical dictionary of Hindu mythology and organized religion, geography, history, and literature, Routledge
  3. ^ The Vishnu Purana: Book Four: Chapter I
  4. ^ Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (1964), Indian Philosophy (7 ed.), People's Publishing House, New Delhi
  5. ^ Yorke, Christopher (February 2006). "Malchronia: Cryonics and Bionics every bit Primitive Weapons in the State of war on Time". Journal of Evolution and Engineering. 15 (1): 73–85. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  6. ^ Rosenberg, Donna (1997). Folklore, myths, and legends: a world perspective. McGraw-Hill. p. 421. ISBN978-0-8442-5780-eight.
  7. ^ Taanit 23a Hebrew/Aramaic text at Mechon-Mamre
  8. ^ Peter Fitting (2010), "Utopia, dystopia, and science fiction", in Gregory Claeys (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature, Cambridge Academy Press, pp. 138–139
  9. ^ Dong, Yue; Wu, Chengẻn (2000). The Tower of Myriad Mirrors: A Supplement to Journey to the Due west. Michigan classics in Chinese studies. Translated past Lin, Shuen-fu; Schulz, Larry James (second ed.). Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan. ISBN9780892641420.
  10. ^ a b c Alkon, Paul Yard. (1987). Origins of Futuristic Fiction. The University of Georgia Printing. ISBN978-0-8203-0932-iii.
  11. ^ "Missing One'south Autobus: An Anachronism". Dublin University Magazine. 11. March 1838.
  12. ^ a b Derleth, Baronial (1951). Far Boundaries. Pellegrini & Cudahy.
  13. ^ Akutin, Yury (1979) Александр Вельтман и его роман "Странник" (Alexander Veltman and his novel Strannik, in Russian).
  14. ^ Flynn, John 50. (1995). "Time Travel Literature". The Encyclopedia Galactica. Archived from the original on September 29, 2006. Retrieved October 28, 2006.
  15. ^ Rudwick, Martin J. S. (1992). Scenes From Deep Time. The University of Chicago Press. pp. 166–169. ISBN978-0-226-73105-6.
  16. ^ a b Nahin, Paul J. (2001). Time machines: time travel in physics, metaphysics, and science fiction. Springer. ISBN978-0-387-98571-8.
  17. ^ Folio Mitchell, Edward. "The Clock That Went Astern" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October fifteen, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
  18. ^ Uribe, Augusto (June 1999). "The First Time Car: Enrique Gaspar's Anacronópete". The New York Review of Science Fiction. xi, no. 10 (130): 12.
  19. ^ Noted in the Introduction to an English translation of the book, The Time Ship: A Chrononautical Journey, translated by Yolanda Molina-Gavilán and Andrea 50. Bong.
  20. ^ Westcott, Kathryn (ix April 2011). "HG Wells or Enrique Gaspar: Whose time machine was first?". BBC News. Archived from the original on March 29, 2014. Retrieved August one, 2014.
  21. ^ Sterling, Bruce (August 27, 2014). science fiction | literature and performance :: Major science fiction themes. Britannica.com. Retrieved Nov 27, 2015.
  22. ^ a b c d Thorne, Kip Due south. (1994). Black Holes and Fourth dimension Warps. W. W. Norton. ISBN978-0-393-31276-eight.
  23. ^ Bolonkin, Alexander (2011). Universe, Human Immortality and Futurity Homo Evaluation. Elsevier. p. 32. ISBN978-0-12-415810-8. Extract of page 32
  24. ^ a b Everett, Allen (2004). "Time travel paradoxes, path integrals, and the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics". Physical Review D. 69 (124023): 124023. arXiv:gr-qc/0410035. Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69l4023E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.124023. S2CID 18597824.
  25. ^ Miguel Alcubierre (June 29, 2012). "Warp Drives, Wormholes, and Black Holes" (PDF) . Retrieved January 25, 2017.
  26. ^ a b c d J. Richard Gott (25 August 2015). Time Travel in Einstein'south Universe: The Concrete Possibilities of Travel Through Time. HMH. p. 33. ISBN978-0-547-52657-7.
  27. ^ Visser, Matt (2002). The quantum physics of chronology protection. arXiv:gr-qc/0204022. Bibcode:2003ftpc.book..161V.
  28. ^ a b Hawking, Stephen (1992). "Chronology protection conjecture" (PDF). Physical Review D. 46 (2): 603–611. Bibcode:1992PhRvD..46..603H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.603. PMID 10014972. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-27.
  29. ^ a b c "Carl Sagan Ponders Time Travel". NOVA. PBS. December 10, 1999. Retrieved Apr 26, 2017.
  30. ^ a b Hawking, Stephen; Thorne, Kip; Novikov, Igor; Ferris, Timothy; Lightman, Alan (2002). The Hereafter of Spacetime. W. W. Norton. ISBN978-0-393-02022-ix.
  31. ^ Southward. West. Hawking, Introductory note to 1949 and 1952 in Kurt Gödel, Nerveless works, Volume II (S. Feferman et al., eds).
  32. ^ a b Visser, Matt (1996). Lorentzian Wormholes. Springer-Verlag. ISBN978-1-56396-653-8.
  33. ^ Cramer, John G. (1994). "NASA Goes FTL Role 1: Wormhole Physics". Analog Science Fiction & Fact Mag. Archived from the original on June 27, 2006. Retrieved December 2, 2006.
  34. ^ Visser, Matt; Sayan Kar; Naresh Dadhich (2003). "Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily small free energy condition violations". Concrete Review Letters. xc (20): 201102.i–201102.4. arXiv:gr-qc/0301003. Bibcode:2003PhRvL..90t1102V. doi:ten.1103/PhysRevLett.90.201102. PMID 12785880. S2CID 8813962.
  35. ^ Visser, Matt (1993). "From wormhole to time car: Comments on Hawking'southward Chronology Protection Conjecture". Physical Review D. 47 (2): 554–565. arXiv:hep-th/9202090. Bibcode:1993PhRvD..47..554V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.554. PMID 10015609. S2CID 16830951.
  36. ^ Visser, Matt (1997). "Traversable wormholes: the Roman ring". Physical Review D. 55 (eight): 5212–5214. arXiv:gr-qc/9702043. Bibcode:1997PhRvD..55.5212V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5212. S2CID 2869291.
  37. ^ van Stockum, Willem Jacob (1936). "The Gravitational Field of a Distribution of Particles Rotating about an Axis of Symmetry". Proceedings of the Royal Club of Edinburgh. Archived from the original on 2008-08-19.
  38. ^ Lanczos, Kornel (1924). "On a Stationary Cosmology in the Sense of Einstein's Theory of Gravitation". General Relativity and Gravitation. Springland Netherlands. 29 (3): 363–399. doi:x.1023/A:1010277120072. S2CID 116891680.
  39. ^ a b Earman, John (1995). Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. Oxford Academy Press. Bibcode:1995bcws.volume.....E. ISBN978-0-xix-509591-three.
  40. ^ Tipler, Frank J (1974). "Rotating Cylinders and the Possibility of Global Causality Violation". Physical Review D. ix (8): 2203. Bibcode:1974PhRvD...9.2203T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.nine.2203. S2CID 17524515.
  41. ^ Erik Ofgang (Baronial 13, 2015), "UConn Professor Seeks Funding for Time Machine Feasibility Study", Connecticut Magazine , retrieved May 8, 2017
  42. ^ Jarrell, Mark. "The Special Theory of Relativity" (PDF). pp. 7–11. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 13, 2006. Retrieved Oct 27, 2006.
  43. ^ Kowalczyński, Jerzy (January 1984). "Critical comments on the discussion about tachyonic causal paradoxes and on the concept of superluminal reference frame". International Periodical of Theoretical Physics. Springer Science+Business Media. 23 (1): 27–60. Bibcode:1984IJTP...23...27K. doi:x.1007/BF02080670. S2CID 121316135.
  44. ^ Goldstein, Sheldon (March 27, 2017). "Bohmian Mechanics". Retrieved Apr 26, 2017.
  45. ^ Nielsen, Michael; Chuang, Isaac (2000). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information . Cambridge. p. 28. ISBN978-0-521-63235-5.
  46. ^ Frank Arntzenius; Tim Maudlin (Dec 23, 2009), "Time Travel and Modern Physics", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  47. ^ Vaidman, Lev (January 17, 2014). "Many-Worlds Interpretation of Breakthrough Mechanics". Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  48. ^ Deutsch, David (1991). "Breakthrough mechanics near closed timelike lines" (PDF). Physical Review D. 44 (10): 3197–3217. Bibcode:1991PhRvD..44.3197D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197. PMID 10013776. S2CID 38691795. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-02-28.
  49. ^ Pieter Kok (Feb iii, 2013), Fourth dimension Travel Explained: Quantum Mechanics to the Rescue?, archived from the original on 2021-12-xi
  50. ^ a b Hawking, Stephen (1999). "Space and Time Warps". Retrieved September 23, 2020.
  51. ^ Greene, Brian (2004). The Textile of the Cosmos . Alfred A. Knopf. pp. 197–199. ISBN978-0-375-41288-2.
  52. ^ Wright, Laura (November 6, 2003). "Score Another Win for Albert Einstein". Detect.
  53. ^ Anderson, Mark (August 18–24, 2007). "Light seems to defy its ain speed limit". New Scientist. Vol. 195, no. 2617. p. 10.
  54. ^ HKUST Professors Prove Single Photons Do Not Exceed the Speed of Low-cal, The Hong Kong University of Scientific discipline & Engineering science, July 17, 2011, retrieved September 5, 2011
  55. ^ Mark Baard (September five, 2005), Fourth dimension Travelers Welcome at MIT, Wired, retrieved June 18, 2018
  56. ^ Franklin, Ben A. (March xi, 1982). "The nighttime the planets were aligned with Baltimore lunacy". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2008-12-06.
  57. ^ "Welcome the People from the Future. March ix, 1982". Ad in Artforum p. ninety.
  58. ^ Jaume Garriga; Alexander Vilenkin (2001). "Many worlds in one". Phys. Rev. D. 64 (four): 043511. arXiv:gr-qc/0102010. Bibcode:2001PhRvD..64d3511G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043511. S2CID 119000743.
  59. ^ Roberts, Tom (October 2007). "What is the experimental ground of Special Relativity?". Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  60. ^ Nave, Carl Rod (2012). "Scout Rocket Experiment". HyperPhysics . Retrieved Apr 26, 2017.
  61. ^ Nave, Carl Rod (2012). "Hafele-Keating Experiment". HyperPhysics . Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  62. ^ Pogge, Richard W. (April 26, 2017). "GPS and Relativity". Retrieved Apr 26, 2017.
  63. ^ Easwar, Nalini; Macintire, Douglas A. (1991). "Study of the consequence of relativistic fourth dimension dilation on cosmic ray muon flux – An undergraduate modern physics experiment". American Periodical of Physics. 59 (7): 589–592. Bibcode:1991AmJPh..59..589E. doi:10.1119/1.16841.
  64. ^ Coan, Thomas; Liu, Tiankuan; Ye, Jingbo (2006). "A Meaty Apparatus for Muon Lifetime Measurement and Time Dilation Demonstration in the Undergraduate Laboratory". American Journal of Physics. 74 (2): 161–164. arXiv:physics/0502103. Bibcode:2006AmJPh..74..161C. doi:ten.1119/1.2135319. S2CID 30481535.
  65. ^ a b Ferraro, Rafael (2007), "Einstein's Space-Time: An Introduction to Special and Full general Relativity", Einstein's Space-Time: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity, Springer Scientific discipline & Business Media: 52–53, Bibcode:2007esti.book.....F, ISBN9780387699462
  66. ^ Serway, Raymond A. (2000) Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics, 5th Edition, Brooks/Cole, p. 1258, ISBN 0030226570.
  67. ^ Mowbray, Scott (19 February 2002). "Permit'south Do the Time Warp Over again". Popular Scientific discipline . Retrieved 8 July 2011. Spending merely over two years in Mir's Earth orbit, going 17,500 miles per 60 minutes, put Sergei Avdeyev ane/50th of a second into the future... 'he'southward the greatest fourth dimension traveler we have so far.'
  68. ^ Dagobert D. Runes, ed. (1942), "Time", The Dictionary of Philosophy, Philosophical Library, p. 318
  69. ^ a b Thomas M. Well-baked (2007), "Presentism, Eternalism, and Relativity Physics" (PDF), in William Lane Craig; Quentin Smith (eds.), Einstein, Relativity and Accented Simultaneity, p. footnote 1
  70. ^ Dean Rickles (2007), Symmetry, Structure, and Spacetime, p. 158, ISBN9780444531162 , retrieved July 9, 2016
  71. ^ Tim Maudlin (2010), "On the Passing of Fourth dimension" (PDF), The Metaphysics Inside Physics, ISBN9780199575374
  72. ^ Keller, Simon; Michael Nelson (September 2001). "Presentists should believe in time-travel" (PDF). Australasian Periodical of Philosophy. 79 (3): 333–345. doi:x.1080/713931204. S2CID 170920718. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 28, 2008.
  73. ^ Craig Bourne (7 Dec 2006). A Time to come for Presentism. Clarendon Press. ISBN978-0-19-921280-4.
  74. ^ Savitt, Steven F. (September 2000), "At that place's No Time Like the Present (in Minkowski Spacetime)", Philosophy of Science, 67 (S1): S563–S574, CiteSeerXx.1.ane.14.6140, doi:10.1086/392846, S2CID 121275903
  75. ^ Geroch, Robert (1978). General Relativity From A to B. The University of Chicago Press. p. 124. ISBN978-0-226-28863-5.
  76. ^ Lee Smolin (September 12, 2005). "Einstein Online: Actors on a changing stage". Einstein Online Vol. 01. Archived from the original on Apr 1, 2018. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  77. ^ Horwich, Paul (1987). Asymmetries in Time: Problems in the Philosophy of Scientific discipline (2d ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 116. ISBN978-0262580885.
  78. ^ Nicholas J.J. Smith (2013). "Time Travel". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Retrieved Nov 2, 2015.
  79. ^ Francisco Lobo (2003). "Time, Closed Timelike Curves and Causality". The Nature of Fourth dimension: Geometry. 95: 289–296. arXiv:gr-qc/0206078v2. Bibcode:2003ntgp.conf..289L.
  80. ^ Norman Swartz (1993). "Fourth dimension Travel: Visiting the By". Retrieved February twenty, 2016.
  81. ^ Lewis, David (1976). "The paradoxes of time travel" (PDF). American Philosophical Quarterly. 13: 145–52. arXiv:gr-qc/9603042. Bibcode:1996gr.qc.....3042K.
  82. ^ Erdmann, Terry J.; Hutzel, Gary (2001). Star Trek: The Magic of Tribbles. Pocket Books. p. 31. ISBN978-0-7434-4623-5.
  83. ^ a b Smeenk, Chris; Wüthrich, Christian (2011), "Time Travel and Time Machines", in Callender, Craig (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, Oxford University Press, p. 581, ISBN978-0-19-929820-iv
  84. ^ Krasnikov, South. (2001), "The time travel paradox", Phys. Rev. D, 65 (half dozen): 06401, arXiv:gr-qc/0109029, Bibcode:2002PhRvD..65f4013K, doi:x.1103/PhysRevD.65.064013, S2CID 18460829
  85. ^ Klosterman, Chuck (2009). Eating the Dinosaur (1st Scribner hardcover ed.). New York: Scribner. pp. sixty–62. ISBN9781439168486.
  86. ^ Friedman, John; Michael Morris; Igor Novikov; Fernando Echeverria; Gunnar Klinkhammer; Kip Thorne; Ulvi Yurtsever (1990). "Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves". Physical Review D. 42 (six): 1915–1930. Bibcode:1990PhRvD..42.1915F. doi:ten.1103/PhysRevD.42.1915. PMID 10013039.
  87. ^ Ross, Kelley L. (2016), Time Travel Paradoxes , retrieved Apr 26, 2017
  88. ^ Greenberger, Daniel Yard.; Svozil, Karl (2005). "Quantum Theory Looks at Time Travel". Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics?. The Frontiers Collection. p. 63. arXiv:quant-ph/0506027. Bibcode:2005qvqm.volume...63G. doi:10.1007/iii-540-26669-0_4. ISBN978-3-540-22188-3. S2CID 119468684.
  89. ^ Kettlewell, Julianna (June 17, 2005). "New model 'permits time travel'". BBC News . Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  90. ^ Grey, William (1999). "Troubles with Time Travel". Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 74 (1): 55–70. doi:ten.1017/S0031819199001047.
  91. ^ Rickman, Gregg (2004). The Science Fiction Film Reader. Limelight Editions. ISBN978-0-87910-994-three.
  92. ^ Schneider, Susan (2009). Scientific discipline Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN978-i-4051-4907-5.
  93. ^ Prucher, Jeff (2007) Brave New Words: The Oxford Lexicon of Science Fiction, p. 230.

External links

Overviews and encyclopedic coverage

  • Blackness holes, Wormholes and Fourth dimension Travel, a Royal Society Lecture
  • How Fourth dimension Travel Volition Work at HowStuffWorks
  • Time Travel and Modern Physics at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Time Travel at the Net Encyclopedia of Philosophy

0 Response to "How Far Can a 22 Shell Travel"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel